Bart vom Leerburg - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Held on 30 July 2009 - 17:07

I only responded to the crap you were talking about.also if you are going out and testing your dog and yourself and spent years doing it and still come on this board and talk like you do not know shit  then that is your problem not mine.i expect people to know some real shit about dogs and dog training if  they been getting out there for years.also read my post again i said i do not care for titles,but i never said i do not get out there and do stuff with my dogs.you are a bit slow. have a nice one.see you next post.

Phil Behun

by Phil Behun on 30 July 2009 - 18:07

I guess you really have a problem with sticking to the subject matter.  And since no one ever gets to see your mystery dogs but you, I guess the rest of the world will never know if "you know shit" about the subject of Bart vom Leerburg.  I'm guessing not.  Now, since I am so hurt by your derogatory comments and bad grammar, I'm going to "cry myself to sleep on my HUGE pillow".  BTW, is English your primary language or just something you're trying out?

by Held on 31 July 2009 - 17:07

Once again you have proved to me that you do not know shit about dog training or what drives a working dog should have.
or anything about a good working dog.you are like the rest of the idiots who think they know about working dogs and training but then when are trying to discuss with them and they have run out of intelligent things to say about the subject,you start bringing,totally unrelated things into the discussion.as for my english i do not give a shit what you think of my english.as i have said before this is a dog message board not a english class.you should pay attention to learning about dogs and training,after all isnt' that what you come here to learn.and you do have a lot to learn and it will take you long time for you are a very slow learner.i think i have waisted enough time with you have a nice and happy learning.

Phil Behun

by Phil Behun on 31 July 2009 - 17:07

That would be "wasted".  Once again, and again, and again,,,,,,,can't you stick to the subject?  Just a little background info,  I started training almost 30 years ago and "cut my teeth" so to speak working Police K9's and PPD here in No. Illinois with my former partner.  Over the years I imagine I had my hands in on working with probably 50 K9's from 20 or so different departments.  I competed in and helped others compete in street protection shows in Chicago.  I started doing sport work with my dogs back in the early 90's because I wanted to test my training with the best of the best.  I'm just guessing here but I think you testing your dog means walking down the front stairs to the mailbox.  Do you even own a dog?  You have proven that you don't know or even have an opinion of Bart vom Leerburg.  Any possibility that you can offer something of value to this thread other than personal attacks on a different subject you don't seem to know much about? 

by Held on 05 August 2009 - 17:08

You are so stupid.i can not belive that you have not figured out that i do not give shit about Bart the dog.Iwas only writting in response to the crap you were talking about; I also mentioned this in one of the earlier responses to make it easier for you.Like i said,you are slow.As for your training for last 30 years i guess it is not my fault if you have been doing it wrong.Like i have said before in many of my responses to other posts that i know alot of people who been doing it for thirty years and still talk shit.Go back and read what you said originally and you will see dumb you sound for someone with 30 years of experience.bY THE WAY, I HAVE SEEN LOT OF SHITTY POLICE DOGS NOW I KNOW WHY.I have a Brawnson  son,i have a Vito son and i have A malinois, i can tell you that any of your polic dogs would have nothing on my Mali in his younger days.see you jackass have a nice one.

Phil Behun

by Phil Behun on 06 August 2009 - 07:08

If you don't give a "sheet" about Bart vom Leerburg, why are you reading this post?  Just another hijack for your own agenda?  Mike Diehl is a friend of mine and I knew Brawnson.  I also had a Quincy son, you know Vice BSP?  The Quincy son was a nice pet, gave him away.  So what you have to offer to this conversation is another tale of "my dog is/was so bad ass that no one could compare?  Gee, never heard that before.  Reminds me of an old cliche that some friends and I frequently use, "F U, Pay Me", which essentially translates to PROVE IT!!!  Don't tell me about it, show me.  Oh, that's right no one is worthy of viewing your dog or it's training.  I guess fumbling around in mediocrity and looking in the mirror every day telling yourself how great you are must be truly gratifying.  Just not enough for me.  As far as the "see you" part, I guess that will never happen being as YOU DON'T HAVE A FREAKING NAME!!!  What is it you are afraid of, did your parents name you Poindexter?

by Held on 06 August 2009 - 17:08

Randy Rhodes was probably the only one to handle a Leerburg dog and produce quality results in recent years and that was due to his skill as a trainer and handler more than anything else.


Read this and tell me what is wrong witrh this statement? you claim to have 30 years of experience,so you should be able to figure out as to what is this statement missing.

You hang around Mike Dehil and then make satement like that.The only reason you had a bad dog from Quiency is cause you do not know how to pick a dog.ahve a nice one.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top