Puppycide in OK-Cop Shoots Airedale pet, asking for directions - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Uglydog on 31 March 2009 - 21:03


ZVZW

by ZVZW on 31 March 2009 - 23:03

Very sad,but true LEO's are nothing like they should be or once were.
Jerry

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 31 March 2009 - 23:03

Just pisses ya off !


Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 01 April 2009 - 09:04

You know, this video is not at all new. I recall it being posted here at least a year ago.

Yes, it sucks. Officers need better training on how to handle animals, and distinguish the friendly ones from the non-friendly ones.

by SitasMom on 01 April 2009 - 09:04

It looked like the dog was doing a "run by howdy" to me. It wasn't headed towards the officer, but looked like it was going to run past. Too bad for the dog and the owner. That officer shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun.

Okie Amazon

by Okie Amazon on 02 April 2009 - 00:04

Odd that you would post this now, I just read in the paper that the Grady County sheriffs office has paid $15,000 in damages to the family.

by Trafalgar on 02 April 2009 - 01:04

Thanks for the update about the settlement.
If you could provide a link that would be great.

I suppose we can feel safe guessing that without the video AND the spotlight that it  helped shine on the case - the outcome would have  been different.

That's why it is not a bad thing  for these things to be discussed in public forums. In fact I think it's necessary.

This is how authority is kept honest and true. By a vigilant citizenry that fights back against abuse.

I thank the owner for pursuing this. It benefits all of society.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 02 April 2009 - 02:04

DAWG,
I'm not suprised, more disapointed.
Moons.

Okie Amazon

by Okie Amazon on 02 April 2009 - 15:04

Here's the link:

www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx





Here is an interesting bunch of links you come up with if you google "Deputy Sean Knight"



http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1W1GWYC_en&q=Deputy+Sean+Knight

by Uglydog on 02 April 2009 - 23:04

Tuesday, March 31, 2009


Fido in the crosshairs once again



 

The apparent police vendetta against dogs continues. This time, officers in Buffalo, New York, stormed into a home during the course of a search for drugs, gunned the dogs down in front of the family, and then left without making any arrests.

According to the Buffalo News, the raided home was the residence of Rita M. Patterson and her father, Daniel J. Patterson. Rita's boyfriend William F. Hanavan, who has served time on drug charges, was present at the scene and the likely target, but the warrant specified only "a white male and Hydrocodone."

Before she knew what was happening, police wearing masks and helmets and carrying automatic weapons had broken through the door. They tied her hands with a zip tie and put her on the floor.

Her father pleaded with police not to shoot the dogs, but they wouldn’t allow him to grab the dogs and put them in another room, Patterson said.

One of the officers started firing a shotgun at the two dogs, one a pit bull and the other a pit bull-boxer mix.

One of the dogs was shot three times: once in the throat, once in the back and the last time in the leg while trying to run away, Rita Patterson said.

The other dog was cowering behind a table. Neither was a threat to the police, the residents said.

While no arrests were made at the time, Hanavan was picked up the next day on assault charges, which may or may not have anything to do with the raid.

Overall, the story fits into a continuing pattern in which police seemingly gun down dogs that pose no apparent threat, sometimes even intervening to prevent owners from securing their pets. Short of assuming institutional cruelty toward animals, the only possible conclusion is that police are choosing to shoot dogs as a precautionary measure -- for those rare circumstances when household companions turn out to be trained killers the police insist they run across from time to time.

It may also be a brutal means of asserting dominance in encounters with the public.

Such shootings are sufficiently common that they've been addressed by the Humane Society. According to Randall Lockwood, Vice President of Research and Educational Outreach:

Some of these reports reveal a disturbing trend. According to a report in The Indianapolis Star, nearly three-fourths of the shooting incidents in the city from January 2000 to September 2002 involved shots fired at dogs, with officers killing 44 dogs during that period.

Phoenix, Arizona police shot eight dogs each year in 1999 and 2000, and then shot 13 in 2001. In Seattle, Washington, there were 11 non-accidental firearms discharges by police between March 1999 and March 2000. Two of these involved fatal shootings of people; four involved dogs killed by officers.

Most instances in which police shoot dogs are avoidable. These incidents often underscore other problems, whether in policies, procedures, communication or training.<






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top