
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Videx on 15 March 2009 - 12:03
Television programme: Monday 16th March -
ITV1 -"PETS UNDERCOVER" @ 8.00pm
"ARE VETS OVERCHARGING US?"
**************

by missbeeb on 15 March 2009 - 13:03
Thanks for the info!
by Blackdogz on 15 March 2009 - 13:03
by shepherdmom on 15 March 2009 - 14:03

by Marisa on 15 March 2009 - 17:03
by TessJ10 on 16 March 2009 - 15:03
"Yes, totally! For some examples... A blood panel sent out that costs you $170, only costs the vet $25. A vaccine costs $3- $7, prescription drugs cost pennies, microchips cost about $5-$10 and they charge $80-$100. It's gross and disgusting how much they charge for things. But remember, the vet is still a lot cheaper that your human doctor, people just don't realize this because they usually have insurance and never see what the actual cost of their visit was."
So then why is it "gross and disgusting"? I don't get it.
You admit that the vaccine costs $3-7 but add to that the freaking BUILDING, x-ray machines, microscopes, salaries for themselves & staff, computers, examination tables, centrifuges, the $100,000-$200,000 DEBT they have from attending vet school for at least 4 years, plus their undergraduate degree, maintenance on all of that equipment and on the building itself and the grounds around it and taxes on the same, on and on and on and on and on - the VET pays for all of that out of his own pocket. ALL of it. And what, you still say it's DISGUSTING that the vet pays $3 for a vaccine and doesn't give it to you for $3??????
Marisa, you seem to get it absolutely.

by jaymesie51 on 16 March 2009 - 15:03
jim h

by missbeeb on 16 March 2009 - 16:03
I'm happy with my Vet... very happy. However, there are many Vets in my area (Southern England) who charge a small fortune for VERY simple / routine procedures. I think the first bell should ring when they ask, "do you have insurance?"
I don't think most people mind paying a fair price, for vaccines or any other treatment... but they are not all fair... some are downright greedy and play on the emotions of vulnerable owners.

by Liebe on 16 March 2009 - 17:03
I shopped around for a pet passport, which only included the rabies innoculation, blood testing and production of the passport. My local vet charged £200 and if I was willing to travel about 1hr I could get that cost down to £110 - that is a HUGE difference.
Also when I was having my cat neutered my vet offered to chip him at the same time, which they did - and then charged me £25 for it - the same price you pay if you only go in for the chip! Surely they could have discounted seeing as it wasnt taking an appointment slot up! - As a result I'm now able to chip my own animals and knowing the wholesale cost of the chips - the vets put an enourmous mark up on them - much like they do with wormers when you compare online pharmacies against your vet for the same product.

by Alyssa Myracle on 16 March 2009 - 18:03
Oooh, you could put a tax on pet licenses to fund it!
[that's sarcasm, folks.]
It really is a catch 22. On one hand, I can see that Vets have quite a bit of overhead- renting or paying a mortgage on their office space, the cost of equipment purchases, staff payroll, the cost of continuing education, paying off student loans... it can add up, and the cost is passed onto us.
On the other hand, is it really our job to pay off their student loans?
Perhaps they should take a cut in pay, to make sure the rent gets payed?
I really don't have an answer.
Ultimately, I guess it all comes down to what a person is willing to pay. In a free market system, if people refuse to pay such astronomical amounts, the vets charging them will go out of business, or lower their price.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top