Over-Angulation, or Poor Structure? - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

CrysBuck25

by CrysBuck25 on 05 February 2009 - 06:02

Check out this dog I saw on an ad here today

www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/pedigree/572929.html

This is something I don't think I'd want to see in my dog.  The poor thing looks like it's going to collapse, or he's going to sit down and keep his feet behind him. Opinions?

Crys

This dog looks like he'd be right at home at Covy-Tucker Hills...

dogshome9

by dogshome9 on 05 February 2009 - 06:02

Sorry to disagree but I like this puppy at this stage. Yes he does have a lot of growing to do but I would wait and see.

by Kenan on 05 February 2009 - 07:02

To each his own.

Videx

by Videx on 05 February 2009 - 08:02

Perhaps you may care to observe the gap between the rear paws, and then, with brain engaged, consider it is far to wide. Then imagine, if possible, the gap between the rear paws narrowed to approximately half of what it actually is. You will then see a much more natural and acceptable stance for this puppy. The HUMAN factor has overly distorted this dogs overline and overstretched its hindquarters. It is essential, when looking at a posed GSD to make an attempt to understand how the pose has been formed. It is unacceptable to simply look at the shape presented and simply condemn the dog. The handler is usually the root cause of any distortions. It is also wise to remember that a photo is but a fraction of a second caught on camera, and rarely gives the whole and accurate image of a dog.

Kaffirdog

by Kaffirdog on 05 February 2009 - 08:02

It never fails to amaze me that handlers pose showline dogs in this distorted position and then complain when others say they are roach backed and sinking on the hind end.

Margaret N-J


aristianM

by aristianM on 05 February 2009 - 09:02

All things put aside, I would be ashamed of owning a pup that wont be able to walk straight with compensating for the abnormal assembly of his rear! Again, Im happy that Ill be getting a WL! So long, pathetic showlines!

pod

by pod on 05 February 2009 - 11:02

Certainly over-handling does accentuate the topline slope and rear hindagles but IMHO there's no way this pup would have normal construction ie straight back, slightly sloping topline and ~23 degree croup in a natural unposed position or free movement.

funky munky

by funky munky on 05 February 2009 - 11:02

Excellent post Videx, totally agree, actually a very nice puppy. As for the puppy not being able to walk straight, comments like this show the ignorance of the poster!!!!!  liz

VonIsengard

by VonIsengard on 05 February 2009 - 12:02

Just because a dog is angulated does NOT mean it cannot walk straight.  There are so many other factors, from hips to the strength and placement of the stifle, the hock....to say a topline alone makes a dog walk crooked shows one's ignorance of how the GSD body works in motion. Many puppies go through stages. It's been said a thousand times, you CANNOT judge a dog, especially a puppy, by one photo. The pup has stunning type, I think he deserves to mature before he crucified online by 1 photo.

funky munky

by funky munky on 05 February 2009 - 12:02

Another excellent post from KCzaja, very well put!!!! liz





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top