2008 Master World Schutzhund Tornament - Page 3

Great reply Mystere. Go Carlos

Carlos, thank you for answering my questions.  I will support the event in any way I can and will contact you privately for ideas on how to do that.

Diane Seaman

Quote by Mystere:

Fiona,

What a nasty attitude to drag onto such an otherwise joyful thread!
What possible business is it of yours as to who he INVITES and why? Carlos is putting on the event and being generous enough to share it with the rest of us. He can set whatever criteria he wants and, frankly, any one else's opinion about his criteria is irrelevant and immaterial. Yes, if he is footing the bill, NOT you, then HIS criteria, whatever it may be is THE criteria, not YOUR uninformed, un-paying opinion. Get yoyr own sandbox and you can set criteria more to your liking. Sheesh! Take you meds already!!
******************************************************************************************************************************

It's proported to be the 2008 Master World Schutzhund Tournament.  It's porported to be by invitation only.

What is your damn problem with me asking what the criteria is for determining who is invited and who isn't and where is that any of your damn business?

As far as what possible business it would be of mine or anyone else's for that matter (as I notice now I'm not the only one who asked), I guess that would go to a) whether or not I would considering sponsoring the event (sponsorship as is indicated on the homepage of the link given) or b) whether or not it would be worth attending and therefore also "sponsoring" indirectly as a spectator.

Nobody is saying that Carlos can't make the rules if he's footing the bill.  Take your own meds and go back to school!  Study comprehension!  Nobody even remotely indicated that. 

As far as "my own sandbox" and setting criteria "more to my liking", well, I don't know what his criteria is for basing his invitations on, so that would be rather impossible, wouldn't it?  It could well be that I thoroughly agree with his criteria and therefore there's no need for another "sandbox" as you call it.  Grow up.  You started this argument just for the sake of arguing.

Furthermore, my question was not asked with "attitude".  It was asked out of curiousity, as I'm sure the other poster's was also.  The only "attitude" displayed was your response.  You didn't have the answers I and another was asking for, so shut the hell up and don't respond.  It's as simple as that.

Run along now.  Go take your own meds and cry to your therapist.

This is very exciting!  I will be watching that website for updates on venue, competitors, etc..  The trophies are gorgeous.  I hope someone will post videos and pictures from the event.

Quote by Mystere:

Re-read your OWN post! Nobody was arguing, or making personakl comments, UNTIL YOU BROUGHT YOUR POISON to this thread. So, obviously, you are the one in need of remedial reading comprehension and medication.

And as for whether you agree with Carlos's criteria, WHO are you that anyone would care whether you agree with his criteria, so as to not need your own sandbox, or not??? Could you be anymore idioticallt arrogant? Ignorance and arrogance is a bad enough combination.

Thank you, though, for making my point. LOL I am through bothering to respond to you.

***********************************************************************************************************************************

Here's my original post:

I understand that the event is by invitation only.

Who determines who is invited and how does one qualify?  What are the determining factors that you base your decision on to extend an invitation?  What criteria? 

************************************************************************************************************************************

And as for whether you agree with Carlos's criteria, WHO are you that anyone would care whether you agree with his criteria, so as to not need your own sandbox, or not??? Could you be anymore idioticallt arrogant? Ignorance and arrogance is a bad enough combination.

  You're kidding, right?  I swear, your ignorance and lack of comprehension is only exceeded by your need to argue and shit-disturb.  I answered your question, gobshite!

Poison?  The only "poison" was your response.  Who the hell are you that you think you have the right to play "question police" regarding questions that people other than you ask?   Before you call others arrogant and ignorant you might just want to look hard at yourself.  You didn't have the answer to the question.  Butt out and shut the hell up.  Your response was nothing more than ignorant shit-disturbing.  There is the "poison" you speak of.  There and nowhere else. 

My question was a legitimate one based on curiousity and was, in fact, no business of your rude, arrogant, ignorant self.  Again, who made you the "question police"? 

It's clear your med's haven't kicked in, or your therapist is ignoring your calls, so we'll just "tolerate" your b.s. for a while longer.

But know this...if Carlos wants to answer the question, he'll answer it.  Now, butt the hell out and mind your own business!

Mrs. Fiona,

proported or porported is correctly spelled purported so we are even and both need to go back to school