This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Kalibeck on 27 May 2010 - 16:05
by gagsd4 on 27 May 2010 - 16:05
Her BT parent may carry a black recessive, and her sable parent may carry bi-color recessive. (or they could both carry recessive bicolor).
She gets one gene from each, so maybe she inherits the bicolor and the black. Bi is dominant over black so she is a bicolor.
---Mary
by VomMarischal on 27 May 2010 - 16:05
Father: B&T, bi
Mother: S, black
In a square that gives you S,B&T; S,bi; B&T, black; and bi,black. So Bella has to be the last one if her phenotype is bi, right?
Then:
Ignite, S,B&T
Bella, bi, black
In a square the puppies are S,bi; S, black; B&T, bi; and B&T,black.
This might explain why my sable puppies are so black on the undersides, no? They are all recessive for black or bi.
by VomMarischal on 27 May 2010 - 16:05
by VomMarischal on 27 May 2010 - 19:05
U or V = light or dark sable
I = black & tan
X = melanistic black & tan (blanket back, etc.) OR bicolor
Y = black
by YogieBear on 27 May 2010 - 20:05
Now that it has been shown to me I do see the difference. Problem is most people don't know the difference - I only found one dog in my girls pedigree that was a melanistic blanket but it was back almost to Klodo Boxberg - so that is pretty dang far back. All the dogs on her fathers side skips a couple of generations of solid blacks - so I guess that is where she gets her dark color - I think I only found one black dog on the mothers side and I am not sure if it was bi- or solid black or a melanistic.. looked at too many dogs as this point to remember.
If any thing I find it education to look at the pedigrees, dogs and history- it does lead to many interesting facts that I might not have learned if I hadn't of looked of each individual dog...
YogieBear
by BlackthornGSD on 27 May 2010 - 20:05
Melanistic black and tan--could be a black and tan with the bicolor recessive, such as Nike:
Or a black and tan with a black recessive (note the tan on her ears and top of her head and that the black doesn't go all the way down her legs, also the tan on the front of her thighs, also no tarheels or toemarks--pictured at 22 months--she did have toemarks until she was about 8 months old):
I have also seen black and tans with black recessives who have a standard saddle pattern (although the black saddle is usually very solid black in this case), so you do not always get a "blanket" saddle.
Nike was bred to a sable dog who was sable/black, out of those litters she had puppies that were:
dark red sable (sable/bicolor recessive)
red sable (sable/bt recessive)
bicolor (bicolor, black recessive)
melanistic black/tan (black/tan with black recessive)
I bred Nike to another dog who was bicolor/black-- no black recessive. From those litters, I had puppies who were Nike's color (bt/bicolor), bicolor with black recessive (melanistic bicolor), and bicolor/bicolor (no black recessive), such as Hunter (note the tarheels; she also has toemarks, which you can't see in this picture:
This picture is Hunter (note her tan eyebrows, tan "necklace," and tan on her chest) and Coal, a bicolor/black recessive out of a sable/black male:
Christine
by VomMarischal on 27 May 2010 - 21:05
YogieBear, I do not think so. Just bi or black and tan. I think that's why everybody fusses over the distinction...so you can figure out how the heck to register them...although I don't think the distinction makes a lick of difference in the real world. Genetically speaking. In fact, I think it may be detrimental to think of them that way. We should be trying to get lots of melanin (because fading pigment is a bad thing for many reasons), and not relying on tags. Just more pigment, more pigment, more pigment, because I think working temperament is beginning to be a color linked trait after all the years of breeding for certain things. Humans and their obsession with style have created this--sure looks like it on the training field. Not very many bleached-out sables or regular saddlebacks are excelling, right? Gross generalization, of course, of course, because various genes will pop up forever, which we know to be true because we still have CHD even if we haven't seen it in our lines for many generations.
And I think this is why I feel that livers and blues are a problem. Maybe it's possible that the dilute factor dilutes more than just pigment. But not blacks and whites, which seem to have a masking gene but real color underneath.
Please let's not turn this into a discussion of fantastic dilute factor dogs because it's not the point. I'm just on vacation and have puppies so I can't go anywhere! So I thought I'd go on a quest to figure out how I got bi-color puppies! I'm pretty sure that the answer is...they are just black and tan, or varying degrees of melanistic black and tan.
by VomMarischal on 27 May 2010 - 21:05
by BlackthornGSD on 27 May 2010 - 21:05
Here she is from this winter:
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top