
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Victory on 25 February 2014 - 02:02
Questions, re: expenses, unanswered.
I was told by John Henkel that (I) "you don't know how to run a big World Trial"
yes he is correct. I do not. I expect many don't.
But this was in response and was deflecting questions regarding expenses , that I posed to John.
This whole thing is very distressing because BOTH the GSDCA and the GSDCA-WDA worked very hard
to make it a nice event. But my completely deflected questions were:
Did you ever attend one of the Budget and Finance meetings re: the World Trials?
Why were entries accepted AFTER the close for the Trial, for teams that did not pay?
Why is Dan Yee suing the GSDCA for those entries then paid by him , for the teams that didn't send money?
Why didn't the teams pay WHEN THEY GOT THERE? Why is Dan Yee suing the GSDCA for entry monies,
that a few of the teams did not pay? Why not go after the TEAMS? Why not disallow entry onto the fields
to ensure he gets back his money , that he paid out of his own pocket? But instead is trying to hold the GSDCA
accountable for bad faith on the part of some of the WUSV World Trial entrants?
How about NAME the teams that have not paid to date? Collect the money from them?
Why after a CLEAR set of approved and NOT approved expenses were set forth by the GSDCA, like alcohol
and extraneous rental vehicles, did Dan Yee go ahead and incur those expenses anyway?
Did he consult the WDA Board?
Did he consult the GSDCA Board?
Was it a unilateral decision?
If it was KNOWN what would and woudl NOT be approved, then why did Dan Yee , and perhaps a few others?
decide to go ahead and charge these expenses, KNOWING they were not approved?
I get from John Henkel , paraphasing "you don't understand what it takes and these are the various and sundry
reasons why it is necessary to have these UNAPPROVED items" Paraphrasing , again. I didn't ask for REASONS WHY.
I only asked were any of these expenditures approved by either the WDA Board , or the GSDCA Board??
I got deflection, reasons and "we had to have them"
No is no in any language and yet Dan Yee sees to repeatedly and maybe? unilaterally decide the rules don't apply
to him?
Then when the GSDCA still says no .he , who has broken good faith, stomps his feet and threatens suit agains the VERY club
that financed the World Trials.
You know , we have five kids and Mr Yee sounds like a classic bully.
and still simple questions go unanswered....I am just amazed.
Also I understand there is a big question about the tracking fields...hmmmmmmm but I will leave that
to someone else.

by bubbabooboo on 25 February 2014 - 04:02
by SitasMom on 25 February 2014 - 06:02

by GSD4dogs on 26 February 2014 - 17:02
by vk4gsd on 27 February 2014 - 06:02
by gsdstudent on 27 February 2014 - 12:02

by GSD4dogs on 28 February 2014 - 01:02
by gsdstudent on 28 February 2014 - 12:02

by KYLE on 20 March 2014 - 12:03
Kyle

by Dog1 on 20 March 2014 - 14:03
There has been some information released recently that addressed just what the costs the WDA is seeking. It appears there's some soul searching going on within the WDA. From the January 2014 Treasurer's report that has been circulating here's the breakdown:
- 3,000 for helpers expenses that tried out but not selected.
- 7,000 for vehicles to transport to the tracking field, porta potties for the field parking lots and office expenses.
- 1,000 Partial reimbursement for judges and staff meals.
- 7,500 World team 2013 expenses for WDA team and captain.
- 4,000 Universal Sieger Championship for the competitors.
- 2,000 for the combined qualification trial.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top