Orwell / Pls critique - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Ibrahim on 30 November 2010 - 17:11

 Aline,

Before I answer the temperament part, this is the 2nd time on this forum I am told "teach him not to bite the leash" what does that exactly mean please?

Orwell is a serious dog, he likes to play but not over hyper, he is very friendly with people and dogs, he shows no fear, very attentive and pays close attention to his surroundings and always on the watch, at night when we set him loose in the farm he does not sleep at all, he keeps moving around and walks the perimeter of the farm and barks and runs to source of outside sound.
For sometime now we send him to help herd the neighbor's sheep, he is doing an excellent job as per the neighbor, runs fast and makes strong turns and does not give up and doesn't get tired.

Ibrahim 

K9sRule

by K9sRule on 30 November 2010 - 19:11

Ibrahim....he sounds and looks like a really nice working dog....
I naturally assumed that he likes to bite and chew on the leash because you are using a chain leash instead of a leather or nylon. In my opinion, leather leashes are easier to handle and don't hurt your hands. Sorry if my assumption was incorrect....
Aline.... :)

by Ibrahim on 30 November 2010 - 19:11

 No not at all, now I understand why I was told so, thank you I thought it could be a dog term or something with another meaning, now I know.

Ibrahim

Red Sable

by Red Sable on 30 November 2010 - 19:11

Hi Ibrahim, as you know, I'm no expert as to what they look for in the show ring so  I'll just give you my opinion.

Overall, I like the appearance of him. He has grown up to be quite a looker!  I LOVE his colouring,  and  pigment - gorgeous. 
 
Love his ear set.
  He has a nice head, I just like a little more of a stop.  Nice dark eyes for a dark dog. 

I don't think he is too broad through the chest, that may just be the way he is standing or probably that I prefer a little breadth.

He looks like his toes turn slightly out, nothing too serious. I'm glad to hear they are not splayed
His angulation is GOOD.  He stands very nicely on his legs, they look straight, no cowhockness ( I don't think that is a word, but you know what I mean) in the rear.  Nice top line and croup.  Tail hangs perfectly.

His condition is awesome, shiny, healthy and in great shape IMO.

Yup, I'd take him!!


by Ibrahim on 30 November 2010 - 19:11

 Red Sable, wow that is a well put up critique. Thanks a lot. You know since that day I always look at the feet and make sure they are not splayed then I go to look at the other parts, I can say I learned a good deal so far but what really is hard to make my mind on is the front, it still is a weakness and I'm never sure of what I see in front of me or in a picture, I am trying hard to learn the front details but they are sort of hard and confusing.

Ibrahim

ShadyLady

by ShadyLady on 30 November 2010 - 20:11

I like him. I'm a WL person that likes well put together dogs. He has a better front than rear, but it's still an OK rear, just a bit over angulated for me. Decent shoulder layback, deep chest with good width. Head is nice and topline good too. How is his gait? I would bet that his sidegait is better than his rear movement going away, but he probably uses his rear well enough.

The only thing I personally would try to improve, if you were to breed him, were to have a bitch that has all that he brings, but that she herself can help improve his rear and front feet too. I'm a big feet person -- and as they say, an animal doesn't stand on its head. His front toes are too long for my liking.

Otherwise, good for you. There is no such thing as a perfect dog. If his temperament is as good as your other boy, I think that's real fine. You want good conformation of course, but that working temperament, whether you compete or not is something you truly want to hang onto, even if you give way to a couple of minor, nickpicking conformation things like I've mentioned.:-)

by Ibrahim on 30 November 2010 - 20:11

 His temperament and character is almost same as the other one (Erri) except he is a bit more serious and less a player. In slow movement (gaiting) he is less but in speed and agility he is super, he is better in herding and can make sharper turns better than Erri. I don't think his feet are the best but the type of ground maybe worsens their look but they are not as concise and round as that of Erri. Thank you for the in depth critique, it is so valuable to me.

Ibrahim

GSDalways

by GSDalways on 30 November 2010 - 20:11

He is absolutely gorgeous. He has a fantastic head and I love his expression.  He is really lovely.

by Ibrahim on 30 November 2010 - 20:11

 I am not sure if it is proper to ask this here or not but I will do:

Looks so far that Orwell the bi color has better critique than Erri the sable.
Erri has better gaiting, so beautiful to watch him do that and he does it all the time with big reach sure strides.
Orwell does gait occasionally but not as beautiful. Orwell is a better runner and has better endurance and can make sharp turns.
I was under the impression from some threads that the better conformed the better movement and endurance so how come Erri has better beautiful movement not Orwell?!

Ibrahim

ShadyLady

by ShadyLady on 30 November 2010 - 20:11

And there Ibrahim,  you have something that looking a picture cannot determine, but is so very important. Orwell has speed, agility and is a good herder. These are the kinds of things that need to be considered in breeding over the minor conformation things.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top