
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by missbeeb on 20 January 2009 - 16:01
I'm bewildered by your last post, pod. You clearly accept that the dogs of the 80s were good, but compared to what... the dogs of the 30s... 40s... 60s? I agree... and we're now 20+ years on. You didn't expect Dingo or Uran to look like a dog from the 30s, 60s or whatever, why do you think todays dog should look exactly like Dingo or Uran?

by pod on 20 January 2009 - 17:01
In answer to your second question, There is always room for variation within any standard. It can never be so precise as to define what could be considered a 'blueprint' for type. Take a look round any of the breeds and you will see variation in type and this is down to individual interpretation of the standard and genetic diversity withn the breed. The GSD did change considerably from the origins up to the 80s and in my opinion the 80s dogs were at the extreme end of variation in what the standard would allow in angulation, forward reach and topline slope & curve. So it follows that any further exaggerations, as we see in the modern day dog, is a step too far IMO.
Genuine question, as I haven't followed the breed much in the intervening period.... has the standard changed so much so that dogs of 80s that were considered correct would now be incorrect, eg Uran and Dingo?

by jaymesie51 on 20 January 2009 - 18:01
jim h

by missbeeb on 20 January 2009 - 19:01
I think most of the 80s top dogs could still hold their own in any ring today. I don't actually think that there's a huge difference, between the top dogs of then and now... some, but not huge.

by Videx on 20 January 2009 - 20:01
by reason on 20 January 2009 - 23:01

by pod on 20 January 2009 - 23:01
Jim, sorry but I do find that question impossible to answer. The GSDs that I have owned have all been of predominantly German breeding except for the first which was Brittas and I have, since the 70s, preferred the German type but there's is no way that I would own a modern type WG show bred dog, any more than I would own an Alsatian. I find them both too exaggerated.
Edit to add: Well ok, you did say I had to give an answer... then it would have to be German, on health grounds.
The dogs of today that I consider to be closest to the standard are of the working bloodlines. I don't know much about these bloodlines or indeed any modern bloodlines, but I believe these are the East German or DDR dogs.
David, it isn't necessary to have a website to display knowledge of any subject. I no longer own a GSD and I don't show or breed dogs of any breed any more. I have no need of a website. Nor do I profess to have specialist knowledge of the breed, but I do have good experience of standards and their interpretation.

by Videx on 20 January 2009 - 23:01

by pod on 20 January 2009 - 23:01

by Videx on 21 January 2009 - 00:01
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top