
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by wanderer on 02 September 2008 - 19:09

by trace755 on 02 September 2008 - 19:09
JUSTLURKIN, What about the so-called conservatives? Who rail against homosexuals then get caught in bathrooms pants down in a wide stance. What about conservatives that pretend to protect minors from sexual predators yet is emailing,texting and IM'n a teenage boy for sex. What about conservatives that rail against spending yet under Jr. Bush and 6 yrs of a Republican controlled congress the debt doubled.
It is past time we get past this BS and hold all lf these elected officials to one standard. Do what's in the Nations best interest not the corporations are lobbyist that grease their backpockets.
by horoceo on 02 September 2008 - 19:09
Ravenhawk,
I'm not sure you understand the principle of "separation of church and state". And the only concern I have with Senator Obama's church is that is not pro-American, but purely pro-African and unapolegetically Marxist. www.tucc.org

by JustLurkin on 02 September 2008 - 20:09
trace755: I've already answered your question. Did you read my post?
You still haven't responded to my post to you.
You remember the one -- about personal responsibility?

by Shelley Strohl on 02 September 2008 - 20:09
She is a mother of five and looks like that!?
ROTFLMAO! At least we can be fairly certain she doesn't sit on her arse reading/posting to message boards all day every day.
SS
by Blitzen on 02 September 2008 - 20:09
Oh I guess you guys haven't heard about her reconstructive surgery then? I can't think of a better reason to vote for anyone other than their physical appearance. Too bad us women don't have that choice most of the time.

by MVF on 02 September 2008 - 20:09
She cannot get my vote, as she profits from the killing of wolves for sport.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G2pb1VeEgg

by JustLurkin on 02 September 2008 - 20:09
YouTube. There's a reliable source.
Blitzen: What does plastic surgery have to do with her merits as a leader?

by trace755 on 02 September 2008 - 21:09
Yes, I read your response and heres your answer. After 3 years New Orleans and the Gulf Coast of Mississippi are just now getting back on it's feet. You are talking about an area the size of England that was destroyed. About 800,000 people lost their homes. Do you have a clue as to how many bridges,roads, levees,homes, churches,hospitals, schools,apartment buildings etc... that were destroyed. Do you have a clue about red tape when dealing with Insurance companies, State,Federal and local govs? Do you have a clue about the shortage of construction workers, electricians and skilled workers?
Only 65% of those people have returned to the area. About 300,000 people relocated. Those that stayed did so because this is where we are from and our families are here. We provide this nation with about 1/2 of the oil production and 1/3 of all the gasoline the country use not to mention cotton and paper products. Our dock workers are responsible for a large percentage of the food,clothes and goods sold in this country. Do you have a clue how much commerce flows thru New Orleans. When you eat seafood,catfish, crayfish? Have you every wondered who caught it. Who packaged it?
It wasn't the Hurricane that destroyed 80% of New Orleans it was the failure of the levees. If, the levees didn't fail there wouldn't have been a crisis in New Orleans. The main reason things aren't back is there's not enough workers here to build things any faster. The levee's won't be up until 2011 then I wouldn't trust my life to them. That's why I live 65 miles from the Gulf.
by Blitzen on 02 September 2008 - 21:09
It was a joke, JustLurkin. She's got a lot more to worry about than wrinkles and belly fat and so do we.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top