
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by pod on 17 January 2009 - 20:01
Wildmoor, all dogs are descended from wolves, so in reality, it's not 'natural' for any dog to have a roach back. Nevertheless, selective breeding has altered the species into many diverse shapes and sizes. I have not heard of any deformities associated with changes to the spinal column except for those in the achondroplastic breeds. It's the shortened limbs of this syndrome that cause the extra pressure on the back, particularly in the Dachshund.
Could I ask why you think that there should be other medical conditions associated with a roach back?
Could I also ask.... if a Bedlington or Borzoi happened to have the crouching himdquaters of a modern German line GSD, so much so that the rise in the topline fell below the level of the withers in the stance on level ground, would you still consider this dog to have a roach back?
Just one more question..... the backline you presumably consider not to be roached, for example the one in Jim's avatar. If you place a ruler along the back between withers and start of croup, there is a rise of the back above the ruler. This means that the back is not straight. It's defintely not sagging... so how would you describe it?

by pod on 17 January 2009 - 20:01

by Xeph on 17 January 2009 - 20:01

by jaymesie51 on 17 January 2009 - 20:01
jim h
by Wildmoor on 18 January 2009 - 00:01
The reason I believe there would be other medical conditons arising out of a true 'roach' back is the fact that in other species whether that be horses or humans where this does not naturaly occur the species as other medical conditions that derive from a 'roach' back.
I have two WG line dogs and none have a crouching hindquarters, 1 as a steep croup and a short firm back but this does not give him a crouching hinquarter.
by shepherdmom on 18 January 2009 - 04:01

by Videx on 18 January 2009 - 07:01
We should all be able to agree that our breed was founded in Germany just over 100 years ago.
We should therefore look to Germany for the breed standard and the manner in which THEY have developed their breed the GSD.
Here is my IMPRESSIONS of the 2007 GERMAN Sieger Show, considered by all countries to be the WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP SHOW for GERMAN SHEPHERD DOGS.- the largest single breed show in the world.
http://www.videxgsd.com/IMPRESSIONS_SIEGER_2007.htm
You can ALL see the photographs within my article - the arrogance of some, especially the Kennel Club in respect of the BREED STANDARD for the GERMAN shepherd dog, is nothing short of astounding.
This is why I strongly advocate a SPLIT between ALSATIONS and the German Shepherd Dog. Let us get these morons off our backs, let them have their English Alsations, and NEVER EVER let them (Alsations) cross breed with our German Shepherd Dogs. They can keep their LEVEL and DIPPY backs, their crap temperaments, their short front legs, their predominence of weak characters, their overbuilt forechests and all their health problems. THE GSD NEEDS TO BE COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM ALSATIONS, IN THE SAME MANNER WE ARE SEPARATED FROM BELGIUM SHEPHERDS.
The Alsation is akin to a parasite trying to take over the host body of the GSD.
Let us be rid of this parasite!

by pod on 18 January 2009 - 08:01
Do you have answers for my other two questions? -
Could I also ask.... if a Bedlington or Borzoi happened to have the crouching himdquaters of a modern German line GSD, so much so that the rise in the topline fell below the level of the withers in the stance on level ground, would you still consider this dog to have a roach back?
Just one more question..... the backline you presumably consider not to be roached, for example the one in Jim's avatar. If you place a ruler along the back between withers and start of croup, there is a rise of the back above the ruler. This means that the back is not straight. It's defintely not sagging... so how would you describe it?

by missbeeb on 18 January 2009 - 08:01
Shepherdmom, Not in any standard I've ever read, does it even mention LEVEL.
IMO, only the German Breed Standard for the German Shepherd Dog, should be applicable... it's the only thing that makes any sense. Why should we have different standards for the same breed?
You say we're bickering... I think this has been a very calm thread, especially when you consider the topic. We obviously don't agree but no-one's had their hair off... yet!

by pod on 18 January 2009 - 09:01
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top