
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by SitasMom on 17 August 2011 - 03:08

by Donnerstorm on 19 August 2011 - 00:08
I can't imagine!! My son is a senior this year he got early acceptance at the end of his junior yr to college, I'm going to be lost without him!!!!!!!!!!

by Ace952 on 19 August 2011 - 02:08
HP movies haven't been good since The Goblet Of Fire. But then again that is how it is with all movies. HP movies are worse in that they make up events that NEVER happened in the book. That is what drove me over the edge.

by ShadyLady on 19 August 2011 - 19:08

by Ace952 on 19 August 2011 - 22:08
by SitasMom on 20 August 2011 - 16:08

by ShadyLady on 22 August 2011 - 00:08
although they admit some things were changed. Still entertaining.

by steve1 on 22 August 2011 - 04:08
Steve1

by Ace952 on 22 August 2011 - 16:08
What I didn't like was just made up events (Order Of The Phoenix) in the movie but never happened in the book. To have so much material to use, I don't see a point in making up an events or not putting in any Quidditch scenes. if you read the book your like, "WTF is this??" Order of The Phoenix for me was the main culprit.
I just don't like the director, David Yates. He came aboard to do Order of The Phoenix and the movies went downhill since his gruby hands got behind the camera. The director of the 1st (2) films was the best hands down. Stayed true to the cource material with minor changes and great cinematography. Prizoner of Azkaban (probably the best in all of the series) was good and had a different director. And Goblet of Fire was decent and that had a different Director.
David Yates = Sheep Shagger
I agree if you never read the books then yes, they are decent movies.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top