
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by dogshome9 on 20 February 2009 - 12:02
What action can be taken to STOP these unscrupulous vets from trying to scare clients into spending their hard earned $$$ on work that does not need to be done and could potentially cause harm to the poor puppy ???
Not to mention unnessessary pain. How many people are actually coersed into doing unnessessary proceedures on their beloved pet "Because the vet said it should be done in order to PREVENT pain and suffering"
I am so angry and will not let this pass I will be ringing to speak to the vet concerned and also to the practice manager.
Thankfully I always tell my puppy buyers to contact me ASAP if they are concerned or feel uncomfortable with anything that a vet tells them. In the future I will have to find a list of reputable vets in the new owners local area.
How many more things do we have to protect our precious puppies from ???
by Vikram on 20 February 2009 - 12:02
regards

by Ryanhaus on 20 February 2009 - 12:02

If they live far away, and can't come to my vet, I tell them to get a second or maybe third opinion,
Times are tough, not only for the regular people, but especially for the so called professionals

by eichenluft on 20 February 2009 - 14:02
molly

by Rezkat5 on 20 February 2009 - 14:02
Actually I won't be going back after baby and will continue to go to the place where I worked. Only because, I know how they operate and probably wouldn't be happy at another vet! Plus I like to be in too much control! LOL
Kathy

by Okie Amazon on 20 February 2009 - 15:02
Good grief! This is on the order of having a radical mastectomy to prevent getting breast cancer!
No, actually it's much worse. At least the the former guarantees you won't get BC.

by ziegenfarm on 20 February 2009 - 15:02
my mind is scrambling on this one! what 2 bones could they possibly fuse? how could it prevent hip dysplasia? i had heard of this once before and passed it off as a misunderstanding or a whacko. at 14 wks, this is just incredible to me! the puppy is barely formed! that pup will do A LOT of growing. i would not even want to diagnose at that age.....let alone try to treat. quite honestly, dogshome, i would be on the alert where this buyer is concerned. unless i miss my guess, you will be hearing from her again. if it were me, i'd probably offer to buy the pup back right now and be done with her. but then that's just me.
pjp
by susanandthek9s on 20 February 2009 - 15:02
Not insane at all. The surgery is called juvenile pubic symphysiodesis, and there's evidence that it helps if the pup is susceptible to hip dysplasia. There's a nice summary of one study at
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18536855
More info at:
http://www.centralfloridaanimaler.com/Hip_Dysplasia.html
http://www.altaranchopet.com/Information_library/Dog_Cat/hip_dysplasia.htm
It's a minor procedure, and the pup is typically bouncing around happily the next day. If it's necessary and it works, it will prevent a great deal of suffering.
The surgery would be a ripoff only if there was no good reason to believe the pup was prone to developing hip dysplasia.

by UrsulaGSD on 20 February 2009 - 15:02
Another thing is that vets like to find genetic defects when they are unable to solve certain disorders. So, I always tell the buyers to first contact me, in case there is any problem with the dog.
by jayne241 on 20 February 2009 - 16:02
If it's necessary and it works, it will prevent a great deal of suffering.Then, when should it be used? Only if the parents are known to pass on HD? In which case, they shouldn't have been bred... so then the pup would've come from a questionable source(breeder/pet store)... in which case the owners probably wouldn't be conscientious enough to have the surgery, would they?
The surgery would be a ripoff only if there was no good reason to believe the pup was prone to developing hip dysplasia.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top