
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by funky munky on 08 November 2008 - 11:11
Well said Epaminondas, couldn't have put it better myself. It does however look as though the deleting has been stopped, for now anyway,only time will tell. liz

by missbeeb on 08 November 2008 - 15:11
I'm bewildered... why would you start a thread titled "DELETING POSTS", which is very topical and pertinent, and expect to discuss something else?
We've "done to death" the whole BBC programme, the KC / BC meeting and reached agreement of a kind. (Clearly, you missed it all.) The 2 tier registration proposal, was compiled by David Payne (Videx) as we requested. The original idea of the 2 tier system was put forward by "Reason", a member of this forum.
If any of us thought that the KC would agree (it's been tried before) to only register litters from tested, scored etc parents... that's what we'd have plumped for... obviously!
I'm perfectly happy to, "BUMP OFF" of your inappropriately titled thread, however, I take strong exception to your comments, that there is a witch hunt in progress or that I have a personal agenda!
You are free, as are the rest of us, to comment, have an opinion, an idea... whatever... but I suggest you try the "route" of accuracy, if you expect to be taken seriously.

by funky munky on 08 November 2008 - 17:11
HONESTY, i notice your concern here about pulling together after the BBC programme, and yet you were not concerned enough to post one word on the BREED IMPROVEMENT THREAD. Or maybe you did comment, under your real name!!!!!!! Kinda makes your "anonymous" name HONESTY, a bit of a joke. liz
by beepy on 08 November 2008 - 18:11
Honesty - you say that you dont agree with the idea of the 2 tier system, and you think that the KC should get behind all the testing that good breeders already do. SO DO THE REST OF US However we recognise that the KC doesnt have the balls/backbone or anything else to turn away the puppy farmers or those who breed indiscriminantely. It was our way of coming up with something that showed the better breeders easily and if a breeder dropped their standards for whatever reason it would be highlighted by the pedigree issued by the KC. It was also something that could go across the board and encompass all breeds with very minor adjustments.
Before you run down the rest of us, tell us what you have done other than have a rant on here?
by Honesty on 08 November 2008 - 22:11
OK Beepy
Let's be HONEST - I have absolutely nothing to hide.
I will give you:
* MY NAME
* MY POSITION
* MY AIMS
On the condition that:
BEEPY - FUNCKY MONKEY - MISSBEEB - EPAMIONDAS - WUZZUP and WATCHER also identify themselves.
TO THE OWNER OF THIS SITE - I WOULD LIKE YOU TO GUARANTEE THAT YOU WILL DELETE THE ABOVE NAMES IF THEY DO NOT CONFORM TO THIS REQUEST.
by beepy on 08 November 2008 - 22:11
A name means nothing if that person doesnt have the recognition to make it mean something. I have never shown at any of the big shows, and most of my friends whilst while being dog lovers are not GSD people. The only GSD people that probably know me are those who I have bought my dogs from.
As for wanting a position???? I cant understand that request.
I am a happy GSD owner who spends much of her time working her dogs, teaching children not to be scared of dogs and bringing up her children to be responsible people in the future. Aims, to be a person who can hold her head up in the street knowing I have done the best I can, to continue to keep healthy happy animals and to eventually help better the breed by breeding GSDs that have good confirmation, temperment and health screening.
The whole point of this type of forum is that you dont have to give your name or it would be compulsory when signing up.

by missbeeb on 08 November 2008 - 22:11
Hi Beepy, This is a no brainer... no answers to our questions or apologies for getting it wrong just another rant for no reason! Sound familiar?
by beepy on 08 November 2008 - 23:11
Oh yep.
Just toying with putting something on here and seeing if it rattles any cages and gets deleted!
by Honesty on 09 November 2008 - 00:11
NO CAGES RATTLED
So far we have both MISSBEEB and BEEPY who are not prepared to give their names -
FUNCKY MONKEY, EPAMIONDAS - WUZZUP and WATCHER - are you prepared
TO THE OWNER OF THIS SITE - I WOULD LIKE YOU TO GUARANTEE THAT YOU WILL DELETE THE ABOVE NAMES IF THEY DO NOT CONFORM TO THIS REQUEST.
I am still waiting!
by beepy on 09 November 2008 - 00:11
If I gave my name it wouldnt mean anything.
When my actions make a point then you will know who I am. My alias on here is my regular knickname and if you knew me you would know that.
My phone is xdirectory so a Name and area wouldnt grant you anymore than that.
If and when OLI changes the rules and requests all people to post under their given name I will do that.
What I would like to know is why my name is such an issue, as with it you will not be any further forward, as only those I have purchased dogs from would know me and I certainly wouldnt lower myself to give you those names and they dont deserve any harassment.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top