Casey Anthony - Page 6

I don't see any point in crying about the media, you'll be blue in the face if you do. Part of our lives in the Electronic Age. My point goes back to the question did it matter that Casey's life was on the line? 

I'm the only one who thinks, yes, it seems, because it also just seems to me the defense was like such a "hail mary play" that worked. This idea never would have been conceived if the stakes weren't so high, IMHO. 

If the stakes weren't so high, would throwing George under the bus have been as believable in the sense of creating doubt? Hmmmmmmmmmm.......

i missed the sentencing.....what did she get?

4 counts lying to Police and she gets outta jail July 13, 2011

Bee,

"My point goes back to the question did it matter that Casey's life was on the line"?

NO, IMO. Because according to the judge's instructions she could have been convicted of several lesser crimes that the death penalty couldn't be given out on. Now my opion is based on the fact that the jury read and understood the judge's instructions.

Over the weeknd I read several juror's comments (I assume given during the juror selection process).

One of them stated I could never point the finger at anyone.

The other stated only God can Judge.

So I thought Oh boy it doesn't look like these two could convict anyone, never mind to a possible death sentence.

I never thought it would be a unanimous aquittal though.
 
 

My gut would say the bitch did it. What mother doesn't report her baby missing for over a month and is innocent? If Caley had an "accident" why cover it up? Crying my daddy molested me was just irritating. I really don't give 2 shits if he did. Your coming out with it now why? As an excuse? Plenty of people with rotten parents and childhoods who don't go on to kill their own kids or act like spoiled irrisponsible tramps who can't hold a job or raise a kid themselves.

Lying to the police, what was truth and what was a lie? I'd assume she lied about everything, including her innocence. I'd have hung that jury. Probably literally.

when all is said and done, it boils down to proof.  it really has nothing to do with guilt or innocence.  the verdict depends on who presents the better case - defense or prosecution.  the verdict was "not guilty"  and really has nothing to do with innocence, since we all know she is guilty as hell.  "not guilty" in this case means that the prosecution could not "prove" guilt, but it does not mean that the jury thought she was innocent.  i just keep seeing pictures of that beautiful 2 yr old child and cannot understand how any mother would choose the party life over the life of that little girl.  poor caylee.  sign the petition for caylee's law.  do it for caylee and all the others like her.

pjp

Reasonable doubt vs. Reason to doubt. 6 people on that jury thought she was guilty, but were convinced by the other 6 to change their minds. 2 of the jurors said that they couldn't even judge anyone, so that is your foundation for an acquital right there. 11 hrs of deliberation with all of that evidence to go through? There was no long and careful consideration.

Casey is a sociopath and pathological liar. Just listening to the Tracy McLaughlin police interviews will give you reason to pause. She lived with her for several days after Casey was bailed out of jail after the 1st arrest.

Here is part 2  http://focusedinterview.com/p28-tracy-mclaughlin-police-interview-worked-with-leonard-padilla-casey-anthony/  

I'm beginning to think the MSM is promoting this divisive question of the legitimacy of the jury system for a reason.
 

Holy Crap!  I agree with BE!  This is a scary day.

Yes, the MSM is absolutely doing this.
They're also responsible for distorting public opinion of Tort Law and convincing Americans that we have a "friviolous" civil justice system, at the behest of large corporate interests who don't want to be held accountable for their actions.

Don't believe me?  Show me a case that was reported in the MSM as a  "friviolous" civil case.