
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Jenni78 on 23 February 2009 - 20:02
I feel somewhat responsible for this thread b/c I was the one who told the original story. The case I mentioned had 3 e collars on, all Dogtras at 100. The dog was literally frozen in fear of another correction. Used properly, to speed a recall, for example, the dog does not freeze in fear; the dog knows what he's supposed to do and the stim makes him move faster...not shut down totally.

by Baldursmom on 23 February 2009 - 22:02

Obviously, there are scores given at the trails. If you are implying perhaps they are too low to be a bragging point, you may be very right. However, some show people go to great lenghts to evaluate the scores from a prospective pair before breeding, some take the sch title as is. To each his own. After all how many of us pay attention to the GPA of the GQ/SI models?
On the other hand, perhaps they figure that if someones wants to know the scores they will look them up. Again, each division highlights what is important to them, working dogs will highlight 3X sch 3 with 290 scores, Show people will highlight 3X VA
When you see three time VA and three time Sch3 stud dog advertzied, let me know, I really want to see him and his progeny!
Wouldn't it be a red letter day in the GSD world if that happened?

by Mystere on 23 February 2009 - 22:02
Normally, when working folks go to trials and when they are supposedly reporting on the trials, they do so by also reporting what the scores were. You know, like who got the 100 point tracks, of which there were apparenlty several at this championship. Like reporting on the 99 obedience routine by Natinsky, or the 98 protection by the same team. EGADS!! Is the chasm between show folks and working folks really so broad that this is really an alien concept? Working folks report what happened at the trial...and show folks post photos.

by Christopher Smith on 23 February 2009 - 23:02
People don’t use the collar because they are lazy, anymore than people use a leash because they are lazy. Yes it can make training some things much easier. That means easier for both dog and human. Just because you do something the hard way and choose to be a martyr does not make your way better.
by Get A Real Dog on 24 February 2009 - 00:02
Chris I am sure you have seen the dogs that fight right through the e-collar.

by KatK9 on 24 February 2009 - 01:02
What I do when I see it: talk to the people..... maye they just don't know any better....
Sue,
I got ya, I use it ,too. and correctly used i do not have an issue with it. but there are so many people out there, that do not know any other way or refuse to know a different way. and lots of times the right way is not the faster one to teach and learn things...
and most people do not want to take the time and make the effort. and too often the ecollar get's presented as a quik solution and the only way to teach certain things.
The ecollar has it's place in training, but should always be the last resort. IMO.
by Christopher Smith on 24 February 2009 - 02:02
Chris I am sure you have seen the dogs that fight right through the e-collar.
Yes but I don’t think that has anything to do with hardness. The dogs I see doing this are dogs that have been trained unfairly and the dog does not understand why he was stimmed. When you do this to a high drive dog they basically just say “I have no idea what my handler is asking of me. Screw it! I’m just going to forget about the correction and do what I want to do.” That is not what I would call hardness. I call that another broken dog.

by Rezkat5 on 24 February 2009 - 02:02
I don't think an e collar should be used as a last resort. There are ways of using the e collar from the very beginning where it makes perfect sense to the dog and yes as someone said, more humane than a prong or choker.
I'm not that good with an e collar to be able to do so though....
Kathy

by Mindhunt on 24 February 2009 - 03:02
Sueincc, your post is underlined below........
Actually, using an ecollar with a flank strap is not necessarily done because you want to put it on a more sensitive area of the body in order to inflict pain or because a dog is too hard or aggressive. You can speed up your recalls (for example), because the stimulation is uncomfortable and the dog reacts by moving away (forward) faster.
Keep in mind, there is a world of difference between a little discomfort and causing actual pain.
I never thought of it quite that way, thanks for the clarification. It illustrated the point for flank e-collars well.
I am one of those that swore I would never use a pinch collar on my dogs until my trainer showed me the correct way to use it and this was after some very aggravating sessions with my large, extremely stubborn and very intelligent male. Trainer let me come close to dislocating my shoulder a couple times before he brought it up again (dog weighed as much as I did at one time, now I outweigh him, sucks) and I am glad he did. Like my dogs, I do learn from my mistakes, I use them on all of my dogs and it is kinder than correcting the stubborn ones so hard (one good correction is better than numerous light corrections). I am also considering the e-collar () for recall. My male has the recall off-leash down 99.9% of the time, just that 0.1% that drives me bonkers and he does it because he feels like recalling on his timetable.......he is very equipment smart and drives my trainer whacko........said Loki is a good dog to train other trainers on since he is so smart.
by Sam1427 on 24 February 2009 - 04:02
Flanking a dog to teach the out or give a correction for other undesired behavior is still done. I'm surprised nobody's in an uproar about flanking.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top