
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by GSDtravels on 13 May 2014 - 23:05

by Two Moons on 14 May 2014 - 02:05
Are you hoping for some sort of debate?
I think it is wrong for both parent and child, cruel and inhumane.

by GSDtravels on 14 May 2014 - 02:05
Debate? About?

by Two Moons on 14 May 2014 - 02:05
Nevermind..
I'll just take it at face value and let it be.

by GSD Lineage on 14 May 2014 - 14:05
Identical twins that failed to completely seperate. It has to do with the stage of developement that the embryo was at when the divide happened... (I think I remembered that right).
by Bob McKown on 14 May 2014 - 15:05
My heart goes out to the parents and the child.
by vk4gsd on 14 May 2014 - 20:05

by fawndallas on 15 May 2014 - 01:05
I can't watch the video..... Is this any different than Siamese Twins

by GSD Lineage on 15 May 2014 - 16:05
Well, they are less seperate, they look to have no chance of seperation. As vk4 said, shocking, sad, interesting. Above all cruel and inhumane as moons said.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siamese_twins
Other less-common types of conjoined twins include:
- Cephalopagus: Two faces on opposite sides of a single, conjoined head; the upper portion of the body is fused while the bottom portions are separate. These twins generally cannot survive due to severe malformations of the brain. Also known as janiceps (after the two-faced god Janus) or syncephalus.[8]
by joanro on 15 May 2014 - 21:05
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top