
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Bhaugh on 19 May 2010 - 14:05

by leciesters doghandler on 19 May 2010 - 14:05

by GSDtravels on 19 May 2010 - 14:05

by leciesters doghandler on 19 May 2010 - 15:05

by Bhaugh on 19 May 2010 - 15:05
Its sad that someone can be "certified" with only 300 hours of training and take a written exam. Kinda gives the community a false sense of security that they picked the right person. Yes I know that they need to take CMU's so to speak to stay certified. Still doesnt do much for me.
This isnt a hate post at certified trainers. I really want to know. So if you are one and want to post. Great

by GSDtravels on 19 May 2010 - 15:05

by melba on 19 May 2010 - 15:05
I have taken classes and apprenticed, thousands of hours cleaning up poo, grooming and training and I still learn something new on a daily basis. I can and do train dogs for Explosives/Narc/Apprehension and mantrailing/tracking.
All I'm saying is anyone can say they're certified, produce a certificate but it's not worth the paper it's printed on.
Melissa

by VonIsengard on 19 May 2010 - 15:05

by dAWgESOME on 19 May 2010 - 16:05
www.apdt.com/join/certification/default.aspx
If I were an average first time pet dog owner I would choose to go to a trainer with some type of cert versus one with out unless someone I knew and trusted refered me else where JMHO

by melba on 19 May 2010 - 16:05
Yes, it is good to see that your dog trainer belongs to organizations related to training but I'd take that "certification" with a grain of salt. I would be happier finding someone who has been training for many years with proven success and no "certification" then someone who spends "300 hours in 5 years" training.
Sorry, the cert is bologna. The people who are good don't need these phony gimmicks because they have a steady word of mouth clientele
Melissa
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top