Upcoming USA elections. - Page 8

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by eichenluft on 04 November 2010 - 16:11

tracking conditions good in Reno?  Um - don't think so.  But, wait for the competitors to report first-hand.  I'm guessing they will not be full of praise for conditions.  But, some dogs track better when conditions are difficult!  At this level the tracking conditions may make the trial results very clear.  molly

by Einstein on 04 November 2010 - 21:11

bgstout,

Why would I be in Reno?  I have classes to teach, I am not a member nor am I a "dog" person.  Why?  are you in Reno and would like to meet?

Bob Mckown,

Boob?  Piss out of a boot?  You must be able to think of a more tangible insult.  Your examples are going downhill.








raymond

by raymond on 04 November 2010 - 21:11

Mr. Einstein ! Perhaps I could inquire  about your interest in the usca election as well as your interest in how usca runs it's business> Since you are not a member of usca as well as not being a dog person why have you made the actions of a organization  you have no membership in  or  do not participate in the sport it regulates  your  business ? What usca does  evidently will not effect you since you are not a dog person!  Since you are not a member  of usca what ever they decide is  actually non of your concern!  Could you perhaps be a breeder?  that would make you a dog person which you are not!  Not a member or a dog person but you shout pretty loud for someone who  from your own admission has no credible interest in the actions of usca! So perhaps you could instruct us on the reasons behind your  apparant interest in something you  do not participate in?

by Einstein on 04 November 2010 - 21:11

mr raymond,

Since you seem to follow the trend of not reading documentation (in this case, prior posts), here is a snippet of my oft repeated reason.  This is one of the many non-profit organizations from various sectors that is being looked at.
Another student is doing the same on for-profit organizations.  Please take a moment to look at the link below. 

"No, I am not a "dog" person. I will not provide details of my name so you can attempt to bully an aged professor and his students. That is what trapped animals do. Attack.

I am not asking about the organization. We are looking at the structure, responsibility and actions of various non-profits. This is the thesis of the paper.

http://nonprofit.about.com/od/nonprofitmanagement/a/ethics.htm

Why would an election matter? As identified, the illegal actions and ethics issue occurred. Do you, judron55 and CMassGSD think that time will erase the illegal actions?

I sincerely hope that none of you are involved with the profession of police. That would be disconcerting."





raymond

by raymond on 04 November 2010 - 22:11

I would be the last person in the universe to bully an aged professor or the students in your charge! I personally believe in efficiency and for me to wade through all the posts littered with insults and innuendos Is not very attractive!I also find your implication of my possibly bullying you and your students  very insulting to say the least!  Your contention  with usca as I understand it to be is this! the locality where the elections took place had laws enacted that prevented directors at large or directors of regions from voting  in an election   held by a not for profit organization?I shy away from posts that are   populated with  rhetorical language! But  from what I can gleen is that your contention! Usca not following election laws mandated by the irs reguarding not for profitts?Thank you so much! But with my conclusion I find conflict! Irs rules are nation wide!

by Einstein on 04 November 2010 - 22:11

mr. raymond,

The bullying comment was with in the quotations and was directed at Bob Mckown.

My posts do not have innuendos or insults.  I was asking for examples and clarifications.  What I received was insults and attacks.

This is ending up being a long term study.  What has evolved during the course of the initial research is not only how do organizations behave, but how they react to issues and conflict.  Paralells to possible political climate; how will the leaders react to such a shift in the House and Senate.  What do similar organizations do (multiple examples across the spectrum)?  And so on.






by Bob McKown on 04 November 2010 - 23:11

Einstein:
                   I believe if you go back and reread your posts you will find that from the start you were condescending. If your going to study this long term you will need to get experience with the subject matter of the dog world.But again class room  education and the real world seldom come to the same conclusion.

If i,m "bulling " I hope you don,t run out and do away with your self as many of the Internet raised kiddies are doing. I would not be able to sleep at nite... 

by beetree on 05 November 2010 - 00:11

True, be like Jane Goodall, spend some time with the chimpanzee's first. 


by Einstein on 05 November 2010 - 00:11

Bob Mckown,

I have not been condescending.  I have posted statements, questions and been attacked.  When you and others resorted to shrilling and nastiness in your posts instead of providing examples (which still have not been provided), I kept requesting.

I am not interested in the "dog world".  Again, since there seems to be a solid barrier to your understanding, this is for a case study; a paper.  Applicable to multiple non-profit orgainizations, how they follow the rules or not and how they react to issues.

If someone that speaks English and not nastiness and attacks is condescending, so be it. 

bee tree,

I think you have identified my chimpanzees for everyone.  Please refer to the post above yours.



raymond

by raymond on 05 November 2010 - 00:11

If my memory serves I do believe the only laws a not for profit are concerned with are those which affect it's tax status! Now mr einstrin with your chimpanzee comment I have concluded that you are just a shit stirrer! I make that observation because you adress another shit stirrer and cite her rude reference to others on this site! Also I conclude that you are a shit stirer becasue there are multiple thousands of non profits that could use your type of  buulshit instigating!





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top