
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Dog1 on 28 October 2010 - 14:10
The problem with nominations from the floor is none of the delegates will be prepared to vote for them as they are unknown until the meeting is in session. Do the bylaws require nominations from the floor to be considered? I'm thinking they may not. When I read Sturgis, It looked like there may be situations where the nominations could be closed, But, I'm no expert.
USA needs Ron as president. There's no other person with his knowledge of all sides of the German Shepherd. He's participated at the National Level at both working trials and sieger shows with dogs that he trained. He has the corporate experience, the time, and the resources. No one else comes close. I'd pay double the membership fee to be in any GSD organization he's the President of.
by eichenluft on 28 October 2010 - 14:10
I agree Ron would make a fantastic President - however there is a clear political agenda against him coming from the club, Regional and now obviously National level. He was not "chosen" by the nominating committee despite his giving them an interview just like all of the other candidates - this should make it very clear he will be blackballed just as he has been in our Region. Splitting the votes with another President candidate will only make it harder to change leadership, as is so important IMO.
molly
by Bob McKown on 28 October 2010 - 14:10
Changes for the sake of change is no change at all. Change with a driven purpose and focused agenda is necessary, some thing lacking in this election. No strong leaders in this fish bucket.
by eichenluft on 28 October 2010 - 15:10
molly
by Gustav on 28 October 2010 - 15:10
by Bob McKown on 28 October 2010 - 16:10

by judron55 on 28 October 2010 - 16:10
ron writes: absolutely not......IMNSHO!

by raymond on 28 October 2010 - 16:10
by Bob McKown on 28 October 2010 - 16:10
(Oh by the way love your icon i,m a muppet fan from WAY back)
Heres the rub. What does the membership want? I know what you want what Molly wants,what all the chat site folks wants how do you poll the membership?. I,ll wager to guess the biggest percentage don,t care they want to go some where and train there dogs and trial there dogs and have a good time.
The politicos are the hole diggers. The current administration (who I don,t always agree with) seems to have a good working relationship with the S.V. (I could care less) and seem to have plans to effect a positioning of players on a world level (S.V. FCI ,ect...) okay I understand to those with a top performance and competition desire (by #,s a small percentage to the membership) this would be the smart move.
Those running for the electable office. Have you spent any time listening to this group(try the usagrassroots web site for one) They complain about the out of control and lack of accountable spending of the current administration but there full of all new systems,projects,ect... constantly talking over each other and bitching about a dues increase. But where is the money going to come from to afford this? as I stated before you don't get a Cadillac making Pinto payments.
Then there are those who make a living training and titling dogs and teaching private groups which is fine I,m not damming any one for making a buck but many of them (and alot of them are the loudest ) lost some small opportunities to title and have more trials available for there clients to participate in so there screaming foul no matter what the end result is they feel the organizations are there to supply them a capitol gain.
We need officers who are clear headed with achievable goals,with the ability to deal with other countries and organizations on a level Field of knowledge and understanding, and who can understand what priorities are to the membership that really count.
I,m not impressed with any of our group of choices. I do support USCA I do support my fellow club members,I do agree with a attainable agenda unfortunately no one has out lined that agenda that is running for office. I know with any furthering of the needs of the organization it will take money and a thick skin I,m not naive of the cost as most others should not be also.
The lack of common sense with this group is astounding!!!
by CMassGSD on 28 October 2010 - 17:10
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top