URGENT! - Page 3

Oh yes, we most definitely know exactly who she is and despite all her breast beating and gnashing of teeth about how she has been wronged she has now stooped to a level so low I consider her beneath the murderer of Buddy and the bitch who starved Courage.  That should give you all an idea of how low she is willing to go to "get even".  To take a lactating mamma dog and her pups to a high kill shelter and dump them if the "ransom" isn't paid is despicable.  Never mind what she or anyone else may think of Shelley.  Who here would even consider such an act just out of spite because you didn't get your way.  I might get pissed at someone but I would never, ever do something like this out of spite.  I can be a real bitch, don't get me wrong, but this is utterly offensive and goes against everything we hold dear about our beloved breed.  I think she has gone mad.   

So much for the charitible humanitarian and highly ethical champion of the breed.
Its all about MONEY. In this case, a LOT of money.
I call $15,000. pretty steep rent for 5 mos. labor notwithstanding.

...and the manure pile gets turned over yet AGAIN.  The Neverending Story.

I don't care how it ends as long as the dog doesn't pay the price.

Moons, I agree with you on that.

It sounds like signing off on the registration documents would likely ensure the dam and pups were placed in appropriate homes, yet that doesn't appear to be happening. 

And while the dam and the pups might certainly seem to 'disappear' if registrations aren't obtainable, it's highly unlikely they'll be 'dumped' at any shelter--after all, the breeding still appears on the accused's website, so it's not as if their birth was any great secret. 

Just more sabre-rattling and manure-forking, IMO.  The need to solicit attention runs frighteningly deep.

At this point I do not know what to say,
I know what I know, but it's not my place to open that can of worms.

I'm pretty sure it wasn't really gonna happen, it would be a grave mistake.
Things have gone too far in my opinion.

No ones gonna win this, but a reasonable compromise could be reached I'm fairly certain of that.
If only things could cool down.

Disposing of dogs that aren't yours to dispose of is a very bad idea, wrong on SO many levels, not to mention against the law.

How can anyone be certain that this is really going to happen? Because someone says so...it's all here-say. To ASSume that a reputable breeder would do something like this because her "enemy" on the database said so is totally immature and jumping to conclusions....

I do not see anyone putting up any evidence of this...and I know this "culprit" and know she would never do such a thing
Sorry to bust everyone's drama bubble!!


Amanda

You didn't.

Its against board rules to post e-mails here, or, believe me, I would.
It is NOT, however, against any law to share personal correspondence with one's friends (attorneys, law enforcement, members of favorite organizations)  privately., especially when that correspondence contains blatant threats of harm to one's possessions. How real those threats are, remains to be seen, but I am treating them seriously, as written.

I thought I knew my "friend" too. Unfortunately my knowledge was wrong,  and its costing me dearly.