Question about HD - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

allaboutthedawgs

by allaboutthedawgs on 07 May 2007 - 15:05

What percentages would you assign to the factors contributing to hip displasia? The three variables I have heard were environment, genetics and trauma. So, what percentage of likelyhood would you rate each of these factors? Just something I have heard a lot of opinions abuot and wanted some input. Dawg

Janette

by Janette on 07 May 2007 - 16:05

I still tghink its genetics. Because you can take 2 dogs with great hips and produce pups with HD.

by robert 54 on 07 May 2007 - 16:05

Genetics, aggre with Janette,but can be trauma early age,food is part of it.Bigest role ramains genetics. I am interested in ELBOW problems!!!

pod

by pod on 07 May 2007 - 17:05

Just two known contributing factors; heredity and environment (trauma comes under the 'environmental' umbrella). The hereditary component of HD is thought to be ~40%. There is a third factor which can influence phenotype that is neither environmental nor hereditary. A phenomenon known as 'developmental noise.' Not much known about this so far, so unknown if this contributes to HD.

djc

by djc on 07 May 2007 - 21:05

If I had to guess, I would say that

genetics plays probably 60%.

Trauma/Environment 30%.

 I saved 10% for poor diet during the developing years.

 Interesting about the "developmental noise"! Wonder if that has anything to do with diet too?

JMHO

Debby

ebinezer052899@yahoo.com

castlebrookshepherds.net 


by Get A Real Dog on 07 May 2007 - 22:05

It's genetic. If a dog is structually sound, environmental situations will not cause HD. If it is something environmental it is called an injury.

by Badpuppy on 08 May 2007 - 01:05

I would say 60% environment (Injuries & trauma included) & 40% Genetics.    Too many people over feed or feed an improper diet, run and jump their puppies and dogs at a young age causing damage to the bones, cartilage, & joints.  I have seen a few hip x-rays with unilateral HD, I am a firm believer that when one joint is good and the other joint is bad (unilateral HD) it is 90% - 98% environmental caused. I think the majority of environmental causes normally take place between the puppy stages of life to approximately 2 years of age. Once the dogs bones mature, rarely will the dog develop HD. or at least not until later on in life when old age catches up.  At times I have notice that dogs are right or left pawed (Handed) most seem to be right handed. I seen many dogs lay on the same side of their body each time they lay down, If the surface is hard like concrete, or wood, I can see how continual plops could do damage over time. Also dogs seem to push off with the same rear foot/limb each time when they take off running.   I also think that the dog “Indiana vom Wildsteiger Land” that was so popular on the PDB, well in my opinion it may not have been the breeders fault, and may have been just as much the owners fault, I seen and saved the pictures when the owner posted them. This dog clearly had unilateral HD along with visible lose bone fragments, clear evidence of an injury that happened at some point, the other hip was good/normal, this dog was obviously injured at some point in his life. It could have even been dropped as a puppy, who know?  Just my opinions.

 


by Badpuppy on 08 May 2007 - 01:05

Oli needs to put a spell checker on the DB.

lol

by jdh on 08 May 2007 - 03:05

There is quite a lot of bad info as well as bad guessing going on. Badpuppy has summarised correctly the most reliable info we have available, although even that comes into question when we study the issue in depth. While hip status has been estimated by population geneticists as being 40% heritable, it has been shown that correct nutrition can suppress HD in a population, indicating the possibility that environment has even greater influence. The estimates leading to 40% are relative to hip status of the parents. Since 2000 when SV implemented the ZW program, we have seen how very different the results can be from dogs of the same status. We have also seen dogs such as Jeck whose hips were NZ, yet who produced much better hips than did his half brother Zamb whose hips were Normal. Additionally, the inclusion of numbers of unilateral HD in the studies renders the results somewhat questionable. Do your best to breed low ZW litters, but do not bank on that protecting them. Use the best info you have to grow healthy joints with a safe environment, moderate exercise, a diet as close to that found in wild canids plus some extras that wild dogs live without such as a good balanced food source vitamin, and plenty of meat, tendon, bone, and organ meat to provide the type of nutrition to which a dog is best suited. Best Wishes, Jonah

pod

by pod on 08 May 2007 - 08:05

Debby hi.  Regarding developmental noise...... nothing to do with diet (which is also environmental) it has been describes as 'random events at a molecular level.' 

 It's said to mostly affect the development of nerve fibres but there is one very visible effect and that's the distribution of pigment.  This was first discovered when cloning became commonplace.  It was noted that white markings on clones (cattle I remember being a typical example) which are genetically identical, showed a fair bit of variation.

These marking do of course have a genetic basis, but their exact definition is down to placement of migrating melanocytes (pigment cells) during and after foetal development, which is now known to be somewhat random.

A white spot on chest or feet is very common in the GSD and some case are undoubtedly under genetic control, but there is also the possibilty that 'developmental noise' has contributed.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top