
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by allaboutthedawgs on 07 May 2007 - 15:05

by Janette on 07 May 2007 - 16:05
by robert 54 on 07 May 2007 - 16:05

by pod on 07 May 2007 - 17:05

by djc on 07 May 2007 - 21:05
If I had to guess, I would say that
genetics plays probably 60%.
Trauma/Environment 30%.
I saved 10% for poor diet during the developing years.
Interesting about the "developmental noise"! Wonder if that has anything to do with diet too?
JMHO
Debby
ebinezer052899@yahoo.com
castlebrookshepherds.net
by Get A Real Dog on 07 May 2007 - 22:05
by Badpuppy on 08 May 2007 - 01:05
by Badpuppy on 08 May 2007 - 01:05
Oli needs to put a spell checker on the DB.
lolby jdh on 08 May 2007 - 03:05

by pod on 08 May 2007 - 08:05
Debby hi. Regarding developmental noise...... nothing to do with diet (which is also environmental) it has been describes as 'random events at a molecular level.'
It's said to mostly affect the development of nerve fibres but there is one very visible effect and that's the distribution of pigment. This was first discovered when cloning became commonplace. It was noted that white markings on clones (cattle I remember being a typical example) which are genetically identical, showed a fair bit of variation.
These marking do of course have a genetic basis, but their exact definition is down to placement of migrating melanocytes (pigment cells) during and after foetal development, which is now known to be somewhat random.
A white spot on chest or feet is very common in the GSD and some case are undoubtedly under genetic control, but there is also the possibilty that 'developmental noise' has contributed.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top