How False Equivalence is Distorting the 2016 Election Coverage - Page 1

https://www.thenation.com/article/how-false-equivalence-is-distorting-the-2016-election-coverage/

Let's see, this author sees his side of things as a Möbius Strip.

Well thanks for exhibiting exactly what the article addressed!

Perhaps the One View World operates within its own falseness that it can have any fairness relating to equivalence in any form, if it depends on being its own Judge and Jury.

Two sides of any position will always enable each opposing parties to be able to make such a claim as the author. To complain that equal time shouldn't be allowed because one side is obviously right because the other side is blatantly wrong, is really a high brow attempt at telling people they are too dumb to think for themselves.

I think even Hillary would realize the political suicide such a position would put her in.

A significant number of people are too dumb to think for themselves. That, or they're just too lazy.

They have that right— to be dumb as rocks. And they have the nerve, still, needing to be fed, any way.

Actually, some of the dumbest people I know, (and I do not include those with a real mental deficit, or learning disability at all when I say this) usually, only think of themselves. The lazy part, is what they consider as their genius, because that means they got somebody else to do their part.

Politician's know all about all those dumb people, but they can't say it to their faces. They would be at risk, that telling them how dumb they are, just might be what would get them thinking—not to vote for them.