
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by LadyBossGSD on 16 June 2016 - 22:06
Ok probably another silly post by a newbie but , what the heck is a long coat without a undercoat? Is this considered a fault? Can someone post a pic if they know of one please. Thanks

by Khaleesi23 on 16 June 2016 - 23:06
by beetree on 16 June 2016 - 23:06
Without an undercoat the GSD is not the weatherproof dog he needs to be.

by Hundmutter on 17 June 2016 - 08:06
In the UK (dunno about America) I see less and less of these very long coats in the general population, the way Show Breeders have done what they can to eliminate them having had a knock-on effect in the majority of GSDs around.

by LadyBossGSD on 17 June 2016 - 11:06

by Reliya on 17 June 2016 - 12:06
I also have a question. I know long stock coat is recessive to stock coat, but where does long coat factor into it?
Is it dominant or recessive to long stock coat? I'm pretty sure it's still recessive to stock coat, correct?
Is it SH, LSH, LH, from most dominant to least?
by Swarnendu on 17 June 2016 - 12:06
I don't think we're dealing with something as simple as GSD Coat Colour Genetics here.

by Koots on 17 June 2016 - 17:06
by Swarnendu on 17 June 2016 - 21:06
@Koots, I've never seen a LangHaar, but heard that their hairs part in the middle along the spine, true?

by Hundmutter on 17 June 2016 - 21:06
There is often (almost always) a distinct 'parting' along the centre of the back, as well, due to the weight of extra long hair, how flat it lies (even when course rather than silken), and there being no undercoat on the main part of the body.
Not usually so obvious in langstockhaar.
The proportion of such coats in the GSD breed has always been reckoned in with the overall ratio of langstockhaar, as far as I have seen; at around 12% to 20% of the breed as a whole. If any studies have separated out 'long coats' from 'very long coats without proper undercoats' I am not aware of that, but if they have then maybe that would include an estimate of numbers. However, experience tells me that the number occurring can vary greatly over the years, depending on what is generally being bred, and what is being actively selected against at the time. There are of course some 'breeders' who deliberately produce a higher rate of long coated pups because they are cute and they sell. These do not seem to differentiate between 'fluffy' and 'flowing'.
Genetically speaking, there was information that coat length is due to an autosomal recessive gene, it takes two carrier or affected parents to produce long coated offspring. I don't think that has been overtaken by greater genetic awareness - unless someone knows better ? Certainly the results of test matings bore that out. But because the Ll gene is common to all longer haired GSDs (and some other breeds eg St Bernards), from just 'plush' (almost indistinguishable from stock coats) right through to those examples dripping with 6 or 7 inches of body hair plus feathering on ears, belly, & legs to match, unless more recent work on genetics has succeeded in identifying some other factor involved then it is not possible to give a more definitive answer to Reliya's question.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top