A Critique of Darwinist Icons (Icons of Evolution) Dr Jonathan" Wells - Page 1

vk4 wrote: He gets paid to be a creationist. A professional Christian. Like physics knows anything about biology,

 

 

Here you go: Dr John Corrigan "Jonathan" Wells is an American molecular biologist, author and advocate of intelligent design.

vk4, Dr Wells explains your religion for you very well :)

OK moonie wells the guy who denies AIDS exist, got smashed in court for trying to prove intelligent design is science.

Shtal what a parade of fools, still no evidence. Check out the entry in the encyclopedi of american lunatics for moonie wells;

 

Go here to get the active links of whybthis moonie cultist is just another fraud and scum.

http://americanloons.blogspot.com.au/2013/02/409-jonathan-wells.html?m=1

"

Wells is the author of “Icons of Evolution” and “Regnery Publishing’s Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design”, both of which failed to survive even cursory glances from people who actually know anything about evolution; a truly substantial analysis and critique if Icons can be found here. But then, the purpose of the former was explicitly to argue that creationism should be taught in public schools – and for those purposes the actual science is of course less important, since the creationists cannot win on that battlefield anyways (a point that is well made in this review of the Politically Incorrect Guide; after all, the whole frame is that Darwinism has declared war on traditional Christianity; the science is just a pretense). Wells’s lack of understanding of development and evolution (and science) is duly documented; he does, in short, not have the faintest idea, and can obviously not be bothered to look it up either (because, you know, fact checks won't yield the results he wants).

True to form, Wells also wrote the “Ten questions to ask your biology teacher about evolution” for high school students (published by the Discovery Institute). They are answered here and here. Instead of trying to point to any shortcomings with the answers, though, Wells prefers to repeat the questions as if nothing has happened, since that is rhetorically more effective, and the goal is to win debates, not find out what's actually the case.

He also participated in the Kansas evolution hearings and has been featured on a Starbucks’s “The Way I See It”.

His newest book, “The Myth of Junk DNA”, discusses the phenomenon of junk DNA, a phenomenon that heartily offends Intelligent Design proponents insofar as it suggests that not everything in the universe has a purpose. The book is just as well-informed as his previous books, and responses to the first three chapters can be found here, here, and here.

Diagnosis: Appallingly inane crackpot, infuriatingly dense, and reprehensibly dishonest, Wells’s lack of insight and inability to even pretend to begin to understand anything before he starts criticizing it based on personal dislike, is of almost epic proportions. Yet he continues to be shockingly influential."

americanloons is a website with a deliberate and open bias. When you read their page, you realize that their whole existence is predicated on naysaying creation.

Great Video!!!! Accurate observations of the emptiness of Darwinian evolution.

One major factor Wells left out is that while evolutionists constantly say that their theories are self correcting they never point out the absolute hoaxes that are never addressed.

Plain, willful deception. Some of those hoaxes persist to this day. These scientists don't point them out because it would hurt the cause and might allow people to see that evolution isn't science at all. Hoaxes like Haeckel’s Embryos. The drawings of embryos have been know to be faked for decades yet not only do they persist in the college textbooks but the drawings are not pointed out to be faked by people like Dawkins or Gould, while still alive.

They were both aware that the textbooks at the schools they taught at had the fake drawings but, as long as it pushed their agenda, they didn't expose them as a lie. Because the Darwinian paradigm is what is important, and anything goes to move the ball down the field. There are many more frauds in the evolution evidence line. There has never been a "science" so full of fakes and frauds as evolution. From the peppered moth, to horse evolution to Nebraska Man, unrestrained, out right deception runs rampant in Darwinian theory. And the list goes on. Science, we are told, is self correcting. Where are the corrections?

So someone else that writes in correct English uses shtals account to comment on shtals video...talk about frauds.

Where is your evidence for creation, Flew never produced any the moonie cultists wells has not produced any. You cherry pick ancient dead scientists.

Just show the evidence instead of more lies, you hell bound sinner.

I am going to nominate you for an entry in American loons.

Creationist fraud claims Hkl's drawings from 120years ago taught in every text book.

Can't find one.....lol, lol, lol.

Creationist fraud caught out by actual embryologist.

BWAHAHA

Haeckels Embryos and Creationist Bullcrap: http://youtu.be/IZrtHKvS3vY

Didn't you know that evolutionists make most of their arguments from speculations, fabrications and outright fraud. That is the level of evolutionary proof that have always filled the textbooks of kids. I grew up with many of the Icons Of Evolution and what Wells said.

btw speaking of your cut and paste on this thread, I recently read an article that junk DNA is no longer considered junk. Genetic material thought to be without purpose but now has been seen to include further instructions to help DNA do its job. It was extremely interesting that over time evolutionary claims are graually undermined by further examination. You would think they would allow evidence from science against the claims of evolution in our classrooms and textbooks. But if you want to keep young people indoctrinated just don't let all the science be presented. This is educational tyranny and disgraceful.

Show us the textbook that all students are taught 100 yesr old drawings of embryos as fact or admit you are telling lies.

You said science doesn't self correct a post later you state science self corrected the role of junk DNA, you can't keep up with your own lies.