questions on structure. - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by frontlinegsd on 12 January 2015 - 16:01

I have read the other post about structure and jumping and I didn't want to get off track so I'm writing a new one.
I have a question about the working line structure.
I myself prefer the working line.
I have seen many show lines with angulation near their back and hind legs. Some of which were severely bad. I have also seen some working line had starting to get angulation some of the best working lines as well. Although in the working line I have not seen any with the severity of some of the showline. So my question- what is the right amount of angulation in the gsd? And is some of these working lines with slight angulation heading down the wrong path? Or is the slight angulation ok?

by frontlinegsd on 12 January 2015 - 17:01

Here is an example of a wl that refers to my question
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/dog.html?id=2157177-bruno-vom-blusenpark

I have admired this dog. Maybe he has good angulation? Feedback is greatly appreciated

Western Rider

by Western Rider on 12 January 2015 - 18:01

For me, whether it is working line or show line that is to much. 


by frontlinegsd on 12 January 2015 - 19:01

Thank you for your input. Do you have any picture examples of a gsd in today's time with just the right angulation?
or do you prefer no angulation at all? The reason I'm asking is lately I have seen more working line starting to get some slopes in their backs.

by joanro on 12 January 2015 - 19:01

Frontline, that's to meet the fad for market. Doesn't make it correct.

by Ibrahim on 12 January 2015 - 22:01

 Or is the slight angulation ok?

Correct angulations are those stated in the standard, 105 + 30 degrees in the rear, and mind you that is moderate angulation, not too deep and not too shallow


by vk4gsd on 12 January 2015 - 22:01

no angulation at all would be deformed, WTF?


by Ibrahim on 12 January 2015 - 22:01

Bruno

 

His stack does not do him good, unfair for a dog to stack him that way, if he were stacked correctly I bet he would look much better than that.


by Ibrahim on 12 January 2015 - 22:01

this is a correct rear angulation as per standard


by vk4gsd on 12 January 2015 - 22:01

refer a lot of eurosport kennel photos and czech people stacks, the dogs rear legs are pulled out way behing them, what's up with that???






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top