
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by frontlinegsd on 12 January 2015 - 16:01
I have a question about the working line structure.
I myself prefer the working line.
I have seen many show lines with angulation near their back and hind legs. Some of which were severely bad. I have also seen some working line had starting to get angulation some of the best working lines as well. Although in the working line I have not seen any with the severity of some of the showline. So my question- what is the right amount of angulation in the gsd? And is some of these working lines with slight angulation heading down the wrong path? Or is the slight angulation ok?
by frontlinegsd on 12 January 2015 - 17:01
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/dog.html?id=2157177-bruno-vom-blusenpark
I have admired this dog. Maybe he has good angulation? Feedback is greatly appreciated

by Western Rider on 12 January 2015 - 18:01
For me, whether it is working line or show line that is to much.
by frontlinegsd on 12 January 2015 - 19:01
or do you prefer no angulation at all? The reason I'm asking is lately I have seen more working line starting to get some slopes in their backs.
by joanro on 12 January 2015 - 19:01
by Ibrahim on 12 January 2015 - 22:01
Or is the slight angulation ok?
Correct angulations are those stated in the standard, 105 + 30 degrees in the rear, and mind you that is moderate angulation, not too deep and not too shallow
by vk4gsd on 12 January 2015 - 22:01
no angulation at all would be deformed, WTF?
by Ibrahim on 12 January 2015 - 22:01
Bruno
His stack does not do him good, unfair for a dog to stack him that way, if he were stacked correctly I bet he would look much better than that.
by Ibrahim on 12 January 2015 - 22:01
this is a correct rear angulation as per standard
by vk4gsd on 12 January 2015 - 22:01
refer a lot of eurosport kennel photos and czech people stacks, the dogs rear legs are pulled out way behing them, what's up with that???
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top