Ebola - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Red Sable

by Red Sable on 04 October 2014 - 22:10

  Who do you trust?  Do folks still think their Gov't has their best interest at heart?  Considering America has the patent on several strains, and the treatment, why the change in story?

 

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/10/04/the-cdc-the-un-are-forced-to-admit-that-ebola-is-airborne/

 

This Was Then

The Original CDC Position on How is Ebola Spread

The following was on the CDC website in early September and this is the mantra that the mainstream media is parroting as the “official and irrefutable doctrine of science”.

“The virus is spread through direct contact (through broken skin or mucous membranes) with blood and body fluids (urine, feces, saliva, vomit, and semen) of a person who is sick with Ebola, or with objects (like needles) that have been contaminated with the virus. Ebola is not spread through the air or by water or, in general, by food; however, in Africa, Ebola may be spread as a result of handling bushmeat (wild animals hunted for food) and contact with infected bats.”

This Is Now

The Present CDC Position on How Ebola Is Spread

The following represents the present position on how Ebola is spread by the CDC.

“Ebola is killed with hospital-grade disinfectants (such as household bleach). Ebola on dried on surfaces such as doorknobs and countertops can survive for several hours; however, virus in body fluids (such as blood) can survive up to several days at room temperature.

 

If a symptomatic patient with Ebola coughs or sneezes on someone, and saliva or mucus come into contact with that person’s eyes, nose or mouth, these fluids may transmit the disease.

The CDC released a very hastily prepared advisory entitled Interim Guidance about Ebola Virus Infection for Airline Flight Crews, Cleaning Personnel, and Cargo Personnel. This smoking gun document reveals that the CDC is clearly concerned about likely airborne contamination of Ebola. The CDC urges airline staff to provide surgical masks to potential Ebola victims in order “to reduce the number of droplets expelled into the air by talking, sneezing, or coughing”. The phrase “expelled into the air means that there is clearly the existence of the “airborne transmission of Ebola “.

 

Of course, the aforementioned facts do not constitute new revelations to the CDC and the NIH. On May 8, 2002, over 12 years ago, a National Institute of Health publication stated that airborne transmission of Ebola “cannot be ruled out”. And for 12 years, the CDC has been publishing lies to the contrary.

 

Doctors Are Dramatically and Openly Questioning the Integrity of the CDC

 

Dr. Gil Mobley, a microbiologist and physician stated in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution:

“If they’re not lying, they are grossly incompetent,” said Mobley, a microbiologist and emergency trauma physician from Springfield, Mo.

Mobley said the CDC is “sugar-coating” the risk of the virus spreading in the United States.

“For them to say last week that the likelihood of importing an Ebola case was extremely small was a real bad call,” he said.

“Once this disease consumes every third world country, as surely it will, because they lack the same basic infrastructure as Sierra Leone and Liberia, at that point, we will be importing clusters of Ebola on a daily basis,” Mobley predicted. “That will overwhelm any advanced country’s ability to contain the clusters in isolation and quarantine. That spells bad news.”

To call attention to the fraud being perpetrated by the CDC, Dr. Mobley dressed himself up in a biohazard suit and paraded through the Atlanta airport to call attention to the danger that the Center for Disease Creation (CDC) is posing to the general health and welfare of the American people.

Dr Lisa Brosseau and Dr Rachael Jones, in a research article published by CIDRAP, the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, clearly state that Ebola currently has “unclear modes of transmission…We believe there is scientific and epidemiologic evidence that Ebola virus has the potential to be transmitted via infectious aerosol particles both near and at a distance from infected patients, which means that healthcare workers should be wearing respirators, not facemasks…and the CDC’s contention that  Ebola is only communicable via direct contact is inaccurate.”

The Omnipresent Threat of Bioterrorism on American Soil

As recently as this week, ISIS has clearly, and unmistakably threatened, the United States and their allies with spreading the Ebola virus within those countries if they continue to wage war on the organization inside Syria and Iraq. It is now rumored that Jihadist suicide “disease spreaders” will deliberatively allow themselves to be infected with Ebola and expose the American public before their suicidally imposed demise. Don’t believe it? Well, did you believe 19 terrorists only armed with box cutters could bring down the four planes 9/11 narrative perpetrated by the Bush administration? Of course this rhetorical question is only for those who believe everything that is broadcasted on CNN and their controlled opposition, FOX News.

Gross Incompetence by Local Health Officials

Dallas health officials are a prime example that even local health officials cannot be trusted to ensure the safety of the public and even its own employees.

Dallas Paramedic Geoffrey Aklinski, has expressed his concern that the ambulance he was driving was the same ambulance used to transport the infamous Ebola patient, Thomas Duncan, a couple of days earlier.  In a discussion on Facebook he stated that “All the people in the back of the ambulance 48 hours later before they finally took the ambulance out of service… none of them have been contacted. None of the paramedics that were on that shift and went in the ambulance were contacted. I’ve been off three days now. No one contacted me and I was in and drove that ambulance after it was infected…This is definitely a concern and exposed workers have not been contacted or tested…I had to call into control in Dallas at 8 pm and complain to get evaluated… Three days after the fact… I had to demand exposure testing and they are reporting following up with all the people in the ambulance??? Bull crap!!! They haven’t even followed up with the ten firefighters that were on duty Sunday.”


Red Sable

by Red Sable on 04 October 2014 - 23:10

This is crazy, but it made me laugh.  Our world is such a mess.


rtdmmcintyre

by rtdmmcintyre on 05 October 2014 - 00:10

Part of what makes Ebola so dangerous in those  third world countries is that many of the DR.s aren't trusted.  So many don't seek medical care.  How many run to the Dr. at the first sign of a fever with a head ache?  I don't.  Throw a hundred dollars in the Dr.s lap just for them to say, "yep you have the flu".  It will be here and many won't trust the Doctors here either.  Earlier this year they were actually talking about the fact that it wouldn't be that hard for it to mutate and become air borne.   is amazing how fast they try to play things down.  Is panic worse them millions dying?


by vk4gsd on 05 October 2014 - 00:10

if people put their money into research and educating children to the highest standard possible then we might actually know more precisely how these things are caused, spread and how to combat them. at any given moment it is playing catch up to conatin, control and minimise harm. some disgusting people thrive in that chaos and take advantage of the terminally stupid.

 

i guess folks would rather spend their money on proffesional deniers and fear spreaders, get what we deserve i guess.

 

i had a friend that travelled the world in the height of the SARS epidemic, nobody else was flying, he got free business class seats, 5 staar accomodation at budget prices, the whole works, best time of his life, he's dead now...jk.


GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 05 October 2014 - 00:10

They have always said body fluids so a sneeze releases body fluids. IF you get the sneeze mist in your mouth, nose or a cut you will probably get Ebola. Someone walking by a person who sneezed and didn't get any of the body fluids on them would be safe. This is what they mean by airborne. This could at any second mutate into a real airborne virus and then we will have real problems, our governments need to provide funding and resources to fight this and that is exactly what I am seeing in the news. Maybe, we have been a little slow at responding but it isn't all on the US. It won't be long at this rate before we hear of other countries having someone who traveled and is now home and has Ebola, could even be Canada.

From Wikipedia:

The virus may be acquired upon contact with blood or bodily fluids of an infected human or other animal.[1] Spreading through the air has not been documented in the natural environment.[2]

The hospital is not government and they IMO are the ones who really screwed up by releasing this person the first time. People are going to travel and in doing so they are going to possibly bring stuff back with them. This person lied to screeners about being in contact with a possible infected person so do we want all governments to completely close off all travel.


by vk4gsd on 05 October 2014 - 01:10

people want don't want to have any restrictions on anything, they don't want any innconvenience whatsoever, they just want the magic government and the magic scientists to make the ebola thingy whatever to just not affect them or limit their lifestyle in any way but if it kills poor non-white people some place else then so what kinda deal.


by joanro on 05 October 2014 - 01:10

The US is sending troops. How did doctors and other caregivers get Ebola when they were wearing hazmatt gear if Ebola cannot be contracted casually or airborne? How did Nancy Snyderman's photographer get Ebola when they double covered him in gear? Anyone think the troops are going to be safe and not contract Ebola, when the doctors are not safe?


Red Sable

by Red Sable on 05 October 2014 - 06:10

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/05/health/ebola-us/index.html

An American patient treated for Ebola in Nebraska then released is now in isolation in a hospital in Massachusetts. And an Ebola patient in Dallas has slipped into critical condition.

Dr. Richard Sacra had worked as a medical missionary in Liberia but not directly with Ebola patients. Nevertheless, he contracted the disease. He was treated in isolation at the Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha then released after testing negative for the virus.

 


GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 05 October 2014 - 07:10

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/dr-richard-sacra-recovered-ebola-hospitalized-respiratory-symptoms-article-1.1963778

WORCESTER, Mass. — A Massachusetts doctor and missionary who was successfully treated for Ebola he contracted in Africa is back in the hospital with what appears to be a respiratory infection, but doctors don't suspect a recurrence of the virus.

UMass Memorial Medical Center said in a statement that Dr. Richard Sacra was hospitalized Saturday and is in stable condition. He has a cough and conjunctivitis, commonly known as pinkeye, hospital officials said. 

 

These are not symptoms of Ebola.

 

All 3 of these Drs worked with pregnant woman and could have been exposed in many different ways. If this ever becomes a true airborne virus you will know because there will be 1,000,000s of deaths quickly. So, hold off on building that bio-hazard unit just yet.

 






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top