bio-engineering; synthetic DNA, that replicates - a bit scarey - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by vk4gsd on 05 April 2014 - 01:04

i think this should proceed real slowly;

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26768445


by beetree on 05 April 2014 - 12:04

Yep. This is the Pandora's Box about to be opened. All those "unforeseen" consequences. We only discover those when it is too late.


Carlin

by Carlin on 05 April 2014 - 14:04

What do you mean? We have it all figured out, masters of our universe. Roll eyes
 


ggturner

by ggturner on 05 April 2014 - 20:04

I taught my AP biology students about this earlier this year.  The potential for creating better medications makes this technique fascinating! 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/08/030829071922.htm


by vk4gsd on 05 April 2014 - 21:04

Fascinating yes, as pro-science as i am as a layman i think these researchers should be on a short leash. once the the private financiers get a feint scent of a new market potentially worth billions of dollars the pressure will be on to get products on shelves, short cuts will be made and those short-cuts invariably involve researching every possible. scenario relating to public safety.


Ironically this could be gouda's armageddon he so desperately craves and desires, only it won't be for the bone head reasons he thinks.

gg curious, so on the one hand you draw pay to teach this stuff to kids but on the other you deny the fundamental platform it is built on and just think godidit.

how do you live with such a contradiction, you must have a divided mind where one side makes excuses for the other.

ggturner

by ggturner on 05 April 2014 - 22:04

Vk4, I have no problem with micro evolution or natural selection, only macro evolution.  I also teach at a college prep Christian school where students are taught all about evolution, but are also able to openly discuss their beliefs about the Biblical account of creation.  No one tells them what to believe.   


by vk4gsd on 05 April 2014 - 22:04

Do you teach the genesis account of creation as a legitimate scientific theory worthy of equal time in the science curriculum?

i still want someone. to explain how kangaroos got to Australia. after the flood but never bumped into any other countries on the way or if they did why did they keep swimming all the way from somewhere in the middle east to oz.


can't see them micro evolving in the short time since the world got drowned by a vengeful. and pissed god.

ggturner

by ggturner on 05 April 2014 - 22:04

No, I don't teach creation or apologetics in class.  They have Christian Ed classes for that.  But, when they ask me questions about Biblical creation, I answer their questions and provide them with resources.   I encourage them to think things over for themselves and talk to their parents and pastors.   


by vk4gsd on 05 April 2014 - 23:04

Good answer, i for one got no problem with religion taught as religion, would like to hope such classes look fairly at a range of religions and not brainwash kids on just one.

anyhoo thanks for yr honest replies.

the kangaroo thing tho i am genuinely curious as to a christian response in the context of the noah story. nothing special about roos, could have picked any number of unique species including different ethnic. groups in humans.

ggturner

by ggturner on 05 April 2014 - 23:04

Not sure if I could provide an answer about the kangaroos that would satisfy you.  I haven't researched it.   Even creation scientists believe in Pangea so maybe the explanation would be that the kangaroos had migrated to Australia prior the break up of Pangea and were isolated there.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top