New Pipeline Inspector - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Mountain Lion

by Mountain Lion on 17 February 2014 - 21:02


by beetree on 18 February 2014 - 15:02

Keystone XL Pipeline: 4 Animals and 3 Habitats in Its Path

...
Some people, seeing a map of the pipeline's proposed 875-mile route through the Great Plains, may picture the region in the terms of 19th-century explorers who called it the "great American desert": a barren land lacking in natural-history interest. In fact, though the vast herds of grazing animals that Lewis and Clark saw are greatly diminished, rich ecosystems endure. And while the pipeline route crosses some agricultural land, much of it would traverse natural habitats in Montana, South Dakota, and Nebraska where harmful effects on native animals and plants could—some say would, inevitably—occur. (See related, "
Oil Flows on Keystone XL's Southern Leg, But Link to Canada Awaits Obama Administration.")
 

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2014/02/140214-animals-and-habitats-in-keystone-xl-path/


Mindhunt

by Mindhunt on 24 February 2014 - 02:02

Tar sands oil extraction is more detrimental to the environment than regular oil driling.  Only slightly better than fracking.  No to the Keystone XL.  The oil companies are not held accountable for any damage they do to the environment or people. 
 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top