This is a placeholder text
Group text
by jlb4yoda on 23 December 2013 - 17:12
I realize the quality isn't the best. This is a 24 month old female GSD. Thoughts??
by hexe on 23 December 2013 - 23:12
Have the films re-done. I don't see anything that shouts 'dysplasia', but the poor positioning--pelvis is straight, but the legs are not drawn straight back, rotated inward and parallel--could result in the dog getting a lower grading than she really deserves. I'm assuming the quality is the result of your reproduction method of the x-ray, and that the actual film is better focused than this rendition, but if that's not the case, you need to insist the film is sharper in focus.
by Jenni78 on 23 December 2013 - 23:12
You ought to be able to get a fair with proper positioning. Legs pulled down and STRAIGHT, knees ROTATED INWARD.
by SitasMom on 23 December 2013 - 23:12
what is the grating in the photo?
can you post a photo without this?
can you post a photo without this?
by jlb4yoda on 24 December 2013 - 10:12
I have the actual x-ray and took a picture of it with my phone. So, that is why it is grainy. I was hoping to get some feedback regardless of the crazy pixel issue.
by ziegenfarm on 24 December 2013 - 10:12
even with this xray she should receive a fair. better positioning could raise it to good.
pjp
pjp
by Nans gsd on 24 December 2013 - 11:12
I agree with Siegenfarm; I would reshoot for that good if at all possible; positioning is very poor which could cost you in this case. Good luck Nan
by jlb4yoda on 26 December 2013 - 10:12
Thank you everyone. I thought the positioning was actually pretty good.
by jlb4yoda on 30 December 2013 - 11:12
Just thought I would let everyone know that she received an OFA Good!! Hooray!!
by hexe on 31 December 2013 - 01:12
Congratulations on the rating...that waiting period for the results seems like forever, doesn't it?
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top