New Study of effects of spay/neuter - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by joanro on 29 June 2013 - 09:06

 

By Dr. Becker

A new study conducted at the University of California, Davis1 further supports a growing body of evidence that spaying or neutering, and the age at which it is done, may increase a dog’s risk of certain cancers and joint diseases.

The UC Davis researchers point out that the U.S. takes a very different approach to spay/neuter compared to many European countries. In this country, not only are most dogs spayed or neutered, increasingly the preferred timing of the procedure is before the animal is a year old. The motivation is presumably pet population control, and owners are considered responsible only if their pet has been sterilized.

In contrast, in many European countries dogs remain intact and animal health experts do not promote spaying or neutering. In fact, a study of 461 dogs in Sweden reported 99 percent of the dogs were intact. In Hungary, 57 percent were intact, and in the U.K., 46 percent.

The UC Davis study was undertaken, according to the researchers, because“Given the importance of gonadal hormones in growth and development, this cultural contrast invites an analysis of the multiple organ systems that may be adversely affected by neutering.”

Study Looked at the Impact of Spay/Neuter on One Breed, Both Genders, and Five Different Diseases

The UC Davis study looked at the health records of 759 Golden Retrievers. Goldens were chosen because they are one of the most popular breeds in the U.S. and Europe, are often used as service dogs, and are also susceptible to various cancers and joint disorders.

The intent of the study was to investigate the effects of neutering on the risks of several diseases in a single breed of dog, distinguishing between males and females, and between dogs that had been neutered or spayed early (before one year), late (after one year), or not at all.

The dogs ranged in age from 1 to 8 years and had been seen at UC Davis’ William R. Pritchard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital for one or more of the following problems: hip dysplasia (HD), cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) tear, lymphosarcoma (LSA), hemangiosarcoma (HSA), and mast cell tumor (MCT).

The researchers focused on joint disorders and cancers because neutering or spaying removes the testes or ovaries and disrupts production of hormones that play important roles in body processes like bone growth plate closure.

Findings Reveal Significantly Higher Disease Rates in Spayed/Neutered Dogs

The study revealed that for all five diseases, the rates were significantly higher in both males and females that were neutered or spayed (before or after one year of age) compared with intact dogs.

Of special concern is that results showed a 100 percent increase in the rate of hip dysplasia in male Goldens neutered before 12 months of age. Ten percent were diagnosed with the condition, which was double the rate of occurrence in intact males. Past studies have reported a 17 percent increase among all neutered dogs compared to all intact dogs.

Other results:

  • There were no cases of CCL tears in intact male or female Goldens. In early neutered males there was a 5 percent occurrence, and in early spayed females, an 8 percent occurrence.
  • Almost 10 percent of early-neutered males were diagnosed with lymphosarcoma, which was 3 times more than intact males.
  • Hemangiosarcoma in late-spayed females was 8 percent -- 4 times more than intact and early-spayed females.
  • No intact females had mast cell tumors, but 6 percent of late-spayed females did.

The UC Davis findings are in line with the results of earlier studies, however, it’s the first study to identify a connection between late spaying and mast cell tumors and hemangiosarcoma in female dogs.

What These Results Mean for Dog Owners

The study authors consider their findings clinically relevant as follows:

"Specifically for Golden Retrievers, neutering males well beyond puberty should avoid the problems of increased rates of occurrence of HD, CCL, and LSA and should not bring on any major increase in the rates of HSA and MCT (at least before nine years of age). However, the possibility that age-related cognitive decline could be accelerated by neutering should be noted2.

For females, the timing of neutering is more problematical because early neutering significantly increases the incidence rate of CCL from near zero to almost 8 percent, and late neutering increases the rates of HSA to 4 times that of the 1.6 percent rate for intact females and to 5.7 percent for MCT, which was not diagnosed in intact females."

According to lead study investigator Benjamin Hart, professor emeritus at the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, “The study results indicate that dog owners and service-dog trainers should carefully consider when to have their male or female dogs neutered.”

Hart goes on to say it’s important to keep in mind that different breeds have different vulnerabilities to various diseases, and the effects of spay/neuter and when it is done very likely vary from breed to breed. The Golden Retriever findings can’t be generalized to other breeds, or dogs in general. However, in other breeds with a propensity for joint disorders and types of cancer different than those prevalent in Goldens, spaying and neutering may increase the risk for those breed-specific disease tendencies.

More breed-specific studies are needed for a full understanding of the disease conditions affected by spaying and neutering.


Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 29 June 2013 - 10:06

Excellent study!

Thank you, Joan.

My male was neutered at 3, and my female at 2, after she didn't pass OFA.

Having an intact female can be a pain, especially if your house is not set up so she can be isolated during her heat, but I've never seen the reason to neuter males. Unless you are a totally irresponsible bozo who lets him wander the neighbourhood, looking for trouble, there is no good reason to do it. My male developed severe prostatitis at age 3, so it had to be done. I have seen no difference in his behaviour since, except that he no longer needs to pee on the front counter at the vet's office!  He still will challenge other males if they try to dominate him, though, but generally he's very good with other dogs of either sex.

by joanro on 29 June 2013 - 11:06

SS, :-)

vonissk

by vonissk on 29 June 2013 - 11:06

Thank you Joan. Very interesting article and it sure changes my thoughts on the whole thing. I have always promoted spaying and neutering. But I don't think I'll do that anymore. Especially on the girls. 

by joanro on 29 June 2013 - 11:06

Good, vonissk. But don't forget how detrimental it is for the males, especially at early age.


kitkat3478

by kitkat3478 on 29 June 2013 - 12:06

A great big Thank You from me too Joan,
I have tried to declare that early spay/neuter was detrimental to a dogs health and growth.
This sort of validates my preaching. Again, thank you...

by joanro on 29 June 2013 - 13:06

My sentiments as well, Kit.

Weezy

by Weezy on 29 June 2013 - 13:06

Very good article. Very informative.
Thanks for posting it.
Weezy.

vonissk

by vonissk on 29 June 2013 - 13:06

This is the only male dog I have ever raised. I've had some pass through but I am more of a female dog person. Anyway, since it is doubtful I will have another male, unless I am keeping it for someone not really a worry. But on the girls I will definately talk to my puppy people about not spaying them until after the first heat and preferably after the 2nd. Most of what I sell is on limited and I have had people ask me on the males did they have to get them fixed and they would prefer not to and I always tell them it is up to you. But I think I will print this out to put in the puppy folders. I can more understand getting a girl spayed because most pet people don't want to deal with the bleeding etc.

by joanro on 29 June 2013 - 13:06

I agree, vonissk. I have found that one can talk til you're blue in the face, and people will not heed advice. However, an article such as this will give credibility to recommendations on s/n.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top