
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by GSD Justice on 02 July 2009 - 21:07
Thanks
by Nancy on 02 July 2009 - 21:07
You can't say anything about Lou on Leerburg but a lot of folks like his techniques.
You should at least read about his training philosophy to know the differences
by GSD Justice on 02 July 2009 - 21:07

by wuzzup on 03 July 2009 - 01:07
by GSD Justice on 03 July 2009 - 01:07
I have Army experience, police handling knowledge, and Sch training. I bought my first remote collar nearly 15 years ago. I also owned collars that sprayed, vibrated, etc. I am not a neebie and don't talk to me that way.
If you have an opinion I would appreciate it. I been on this site for two days and all I have gotten is smart ass lip from what I believe are at best broken down dog owners. I have received a couple really nice private emails providing some useful information.
I have heard that people who have answers faster than questions often have their head up their ass because the ass just reacts vs. thinks.

by wuzzup on 03 July 2009 - 01:07
by Nancy on 03 July 2009 - 02:07
I think the big change in collars is that in recent years, precise adjustment of the stim has become possible. I put the collar at the low stim setting on my own neck behind my ear [a very sensitive area indeed!] and that level as not at all painful - just tingly.
My suggestion was it offers a school of thought and discussion on Lou's method is not allowed on Leerburg. He does have a yahoo group which offers other insights. Knowing what is out there is helpful information. I think Dobbs Dogs uses a very similar approach.
Unlike many trainers, his articles are free and he is very helpful.
http://www.loucastle.com/about.htm
http://www.dobbsdogs.com/library/index.html
by GSD Justice on 03 July 2009 - 02:07
Thanks very much. I have been using the Dogtra on "vibrate" only. The model I have goes from 1 to 127. I put the collar around my arm and 127 hurts. The 127 nick is painful too. I don't have a coat so that helps. :)
I have used the nick at or around 80 when the collar is fairly tight. What I liked about Ed from Leerburg is his new collar that tightens to a single click. That way, you get a correct fit and consistent fit.
Have you any experience with the clickers? What I am finding is that absent a cardinal sin I have a collar I am only using 20% of the power. I am an old school fan of compulsion with collars (i.e. dominant, choke, pinch). Could it be true that the vibration or click is all we need?
by Sam1427 on 03 July 2009 - 04:07
I too learned the old school way and I haven't adapted to clicker training. I never have the darn thing around when I need it. I can make a clicking noise with my tongue - learned many years ago- and that's what I use. Different numbers of clicks mean different commands. Old habits die hard. What I do is different than the Pryor method of clicker training which shapes the dog's behavior by rewarding with clicks and treats. I understand it, I just don't use it.
by Nancy on 03 July 2009 - 11:07
I have used clicker training for some things - it seems much easier to use on a dog whose primary motivation is food than one who wants the ball, though.-- to me.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top