![Premium classified](https://cdn.pedigreedatabase.com/images/placeholder-min.png)
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by bondos mom on 01 July 2009 - 03:07
![starrchar](/usericon/55409.jpg)
by starrchar on 01 July 2009 - 15:07
A plush coat is shorter than a long coat or long stock coat, but more plush or longer than a standard coat.
A long stock coat has a longer coat, with tufts in the ears, feathers on the feet and has an undercoat.
A true long coat has a longer coat that will actually part in the middle of the back , has tufts in the ears, feathers on the feet and has no undercoat.
I have seen a wide range of the length of hair on both the long stock coats and long coats.
by VKFGSD on 03 July 2009 - 12:07
by VKFGSD on 03 July 2009 - 12:07
2. "Plush" is a designation created in the last half dozen years primarily by hi-line breeders to cover offspring with open and/or marginal long coats ( both faults so we created a new name and walla sell them to innocent newbies)
3. Starcharr - you are much to limited in your description of coats with the GSD breed. There is a wide variability not only in coat length but the presence or absence of ear tufts, feathers on feet or legs etc. I have seen full coats w/ no ear tufts or feet feathers and dogs with a pretty regular coat but ear tufts or leg feathers and everything in between. My personal view is that there is more than one gene involved and it is not necessarily the simple mendalian inheritance most seem to think ( tho some coats are but not all) . I think this is supported by how hard it was to eliminate the coat population even after the SV DQ them.
![starrchar](/usericon/55409.jpg)
by starrchar on 03 July 2009 - 15:07
I agree that I didn't give a detailed description, but time was short when I was writing the post. You are 100% right- there are MANY variables!!!! I think the issue of plush coats is very controversial though and you could ask ten different "knowledgable" people and get 10 different opinions. The explanation I gave is the one I have most often read and heard. As you noticed, I prefaced my explanation with "It depends on who you ask". Truthfully it doesn't matter to me as I do love the coats, no matter what length, feathers or no feathers, tufts or no tufts, but the one thing that remains extremely important that they have an undercoat. You are obviously very knowledgable and I appreciate your comments.
The best,
Char
![kitkat3478](/usericon/15834.jpg)
by kitkat3478 on 03 July 2009 - 16:07
This is T-Bone. A long coat, with an undercoat. he has no ear tufts, and no excessive hair between his toes. Both parents are normal coats.
This is Sophie, also a long coat with ALOT less coat than T. No ear tufts and alot less leg hair. Both parents long coats.
And this is Rufus. Long coat. He is what I would describe as a PLUSH coat, due to the fact he IS very plush, but long coat no matter what. he also DOES NOT have ear tufts,or excessive hair between his toes.(I've had people stop and ask if he was a bear in my yard).
these are 3 very distict and different coats, ALL Long Coats in my opinion!
can anyone post a pic of what REALLY is Stock coat???
![starrchar](/usericon/55409.jpg)
by starrchar on 03 July 2009 - 18:07
by triodegirl on 04 July 2009 - 19:07
![](/userfiles/bella6.jpg)
![Sunsilver](/usericon/23611.jpg)
by Sunsilver on 04 July 2009 - 20:07
by GSD Justice on 05 July 2009 - 01:07
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top