This is a placeholder text
Group text
by leciesters doghandler on 25 August 2010 - 19:08
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuZTkz8eD2I&feature=related
what do people think of that dog ? and would you drop him out the program? i really like him
by ronin on 25 August 2010 - 21:08
Also its about interpreting the behaviour, the seasoned Trainers on here would shed more light on the dog.
Big lump, I take it he is DH.
Ronin
by ziegenfarm on 26 August 2010 - 05:08
about the k9 in question: my first thought was that he had been trained badly from the start, but as the video progressed it became obvious that these were just the sort of excercises that he needed. amazed again. i do subscribe to fred's you-tube page and when i have time i really enjoy his videos. just another way of looking at things.
pjp
by KYLE on 27 August 2010 - 17:08
Kyle
by Slamdunc on 27 August 2010 - 18:08
The handler at the end (2:54) of the video appears to actually be the dog's handler. If this is the case, I have a problem with a stranger trying to handle someone else's Police K9. I would never let this happen with my dog. My dog, muzzle or no muzzle will act aggressively to a stranger taking his lead and giving him a correction. The reaction would be nearly identical, and the stranger would get bit or if my dog was muzzled, he'd be fighting the dog for sure. If in fact, the first handler was not the assigned handler for this dog, then IMO the dog was absolutely correct. I equate this too telling a stranger to go and smack my kids when they disobey. Who would ever let a stranger discipline their child corporally? Why would you ever let a stranger correct your Police K9? That is the problem with these seminars, sometimes the person giving the seminar wants to show a quick fix.
There is a lot that you don't see on that video. Did the dog eventually comply with the new handler, sure. But at what expense? I will also say, that given the right opportunity that dog would nail that guy in a heartbeat. I'd like to see the muzzle taken off that dog and the first handler doing the same thing again. I'd like to see him lift the dog up that way with out a muzzle, he's getting nailed for sure. That guy is smart enough not to do it.
IMHO, that whole exercise was unnecessary and potentially detrimental to the dog. What did a Police K9 learn from that? Did he learn that a stranger can dominate him and make him submit? Exactly, what I never want my dog to learn or experience. I would have handled the whole control issue entirely differently.
JMO FWIW,
Jim
by KYLE on 27 August 2010 - 18:08
by Slamdunc on 27 August 2010 - 21:08
I really like the dog. I would take him for a K9 in a minute, no I wouldn't drop him at all. He's a good dog.
Jim
by Steve Schuler on 27 August 2010 - 23:08
Thanks much for you accessment of what was going on with this exercise in this video. I watched it prior to your comments on it and knew that I didn't know enough to make very much sense out of it all. I definitely had not clued into the "strange" handler aspect. Neither had I considered your proposed alternative to diffusing the dog's "muzzle happiness" in a more intelligent way.
Thanks again,
SteveO
by Doberdoodle on 28 August 2010 - 23:08
Looks like the muzzle was used wrong at some point, and the dog becomes very uptight and defensive when muzzled? The solution would be to associate the muzzle with positive things, and to wear it as a piece of equipment for no reason, condition the dog to the muzzle. And I agree, NOBODY should be handling the dog except the handler. It is NORMAL and DESIRABLE for a Police K-9 or protection dog to attack anyone else holding the leash, they are one-person dogs.
Also, I am wondering, are they using the shock collar at all while the dog is muzzled and fighting? Why are they using one at all? What police departments are using shock collars on their dogs? I believe the dogs should be trained without having to depend on the shock collar. They are not truly "off leash" trained otherwise.
by Prager on 28 August 2010 - 23:08
This is an excellent dog being subdued by E collar to do what he ought to do. There is no art in that. Fred Hassen is a good trainer and exceptionally great marketer which builds on adage : You can not argue with success. But the truth of the matter is that I would like to get to the dog through dog training rather then these mechanics no matter how successful they appear on the surface. Jim said it well in his first post.
Prager Hans
http://www.alpinek9.com
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top