This is a placeholder text
Group text
by kitkat3478 on 03 January 2012 - 12:01
I am just wondering WHY would someone use a dog with this rating for breeding. Just because it is still allowed according to guidelines, SHOULD it be.
I guess I can see why the owner of a titled female might try it (although I would imagine that would be one of those people that don't honor their hip guarantee anyway), BUT why in the world would a stud dog owner breed to the female, and risk that failing hip score coming back on their dog?
Just recently I was informed of a dog that is severely dysplastic from the line of a male I am interested in. When I asked about the female (mother), and was given the pedigree, I checked it out. What I found was a few dogs with the noch rating on the dam's side (to me, not rocket science why there are dysplatic pups).
Breeding for the betterment of the breed,(????),in my opinion should not consist of using anything questionable when it comes to the hips.
The heck with if you don't really care about the buyer, but why risk creating dogs that are eventually going to end up suffering.
Am I wrong in thinking noch ratings should not be used?
by Miro on 03 January 2012 - 13:01
by Mystere on 03 January 2012 - 13:01
by trixx on 03 January 2012 - 15:01
by jdiaz1791 on 03 January 2012 - 15:01
by Miro on 03 January 2012 - 17:01
by GSD2727 on 03 January 2012 - 17:01
When they first started doing the 'a' stamp they did not even give ratings as they didnt want everyone to only use 'a' normal and wash out the 'a' nz dogs. If you look back in the history of the breed you can see why! Some of the top producing dogs were 'a' fast normal, some even 'a' nz or from nz parents!
While hips are very important in breeding, there are so many other things that are just as important if not more important. Elbows, other health issues like cancer, bloat, DM, PF, digestive problems, horrible allergies and skin problems, eye problems like pannus, and so on... And temperament, what good is a dog with excellent hips if he is a mess in temperament and lives in fear of everything?! Then when you have to look at things like working ability, structure, etc... It is often naive to think that a dog should be thrown out of the gene pool for not being the "best" in one area. There are less 'a' nz dogs today then there was decades ago it seems, so a person doesnt need to use a nz dog if they do not want to... but If someone feels that this nz dog is best in all other ways and will accomplish what they need in their breeding program, that is their choice.
I have never been faced with that, so not sure what I would do honestly... but I would take many things into consideration and wouldnt rule a dog out JUST due to their hip rating (obviously as long as they are passing).
Also noch zugelassen is a very controversial rating. Some feel it = HD, while others do not believe that. I have heard of too many dogs who are rating nz then come here and pass OFA, so I dont believe that it is always "bad" hips. But I would probably want a 2nd opinion or to see the x-rays if I were considering a dog like that.
JMO of course
Valerie
by Abbi's mom on 03 January 2012 - 18:01
by Bundishep on 03 January 2012 - 20:01
by Pharaoh on 03 January 2012 - 23:01
I had a great grandson of his out of his son David Nebelholz who had an a stamp and an OFA good at 3 or 4 years.
Michele
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top