Sen. McConnell Claims Electing The President By Popular Vote Is A ‘Genuine Threat To Our Country’

By Scott Keyes on Dec 8, 2011 at 10:10 am

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) attacked a proposal to switch to a national popular vote for presidential elections during a speech at the Heritage Foundation yesterday.

McConnell and six Republican secretaries of state discussed the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPV), a proposed plan for using a popular vote in presidential elections. The NPV would guarantee whichever candidate wins the popular vote would also win the electoral college – preventing a repeat of the 2000 election when Al Gore won the most votes but still lost the presidency. It would do so by getting states to agree to collectively award their electoral votes to the popular vote winner, but the compact would only kick in once states with a majority of the electoral college sign on. Currently, eight states and the District of Columbia have joined the NPV, comprising 132 of the needed 270 electoral votes for the compact to take effect.

Rather than embracing the NPV as a way to solidify the Constitution’s guarantee of “one man, one vote,” McConnell lambasted the plan, calling it a “genuine threat to our country.” Though McConnell admitted that the notion of a popular presidential vote where the candidate who receives the most votes wins is “appealing,” he called the idea “absurd and dangerous.”

MCCONNELL: Hosting this seminar on the most important issue [the National Popular Vote proposal] in America nobody’s talking about. Everybody’s following the debt crisis in Europe, the presidential election in America, unemployment statistics, but nobody is paying much attention to the genuine threat to our country. That’s what I want to address this morning.

Watch it:

This is not the first time McConnell has expressed unease with elections and popular votes. In July, the Republican Leader took to the Senate floor to declare that we must rewrite the Constitution and add in an amendment permanently entrenching a Tea Party policy agenda because “elections” haven’t “worked.”

Awarding the presidency to the candidate who receives the most votes is an eminently reasonable and democratic position. McConnell’s suggestion — that ensuring the person who gets the most votes becomes president is a “threat to our country” — is not.

Yikes! So, would he pick our leaders instead? Sounds to me like HE may be the biggest threat to Democracy! (--where do these people crawl out from???---) Aarrggh! jackie harris

    I Do NOT agree with anything Mr.McConnell says.I have worked for a Major East Coast Engineering firm for the last 16 years,Inspecting Active Transportation Projects in the District that I am assigned to.
  When President Bush left office,my Assignment List of Active projects was Down to 8 Pages.Today it is 43 Pages and Climbing.
 For every Semi-Final Inspection that I conduct,a New Pre-Construction Meeting is Scheduled.
  I am Very busy Now.
  Case Closed.

OUR MAN MITCH...lol,
sounds just like him.

The problem with a popular vote is they would all have to spend three times as much money for television ads.
Ad agency's would become billionaires over night, and the American people would still have no idea of who they are really voting for.
Tax payers would foot the bill.

 I propose printed resumes', voting records, attendance records, and tax returns mailed out to all registered voters for each candidate and a ban on television advertising.
Money well spent.

I know I'm a Hoosier but we still have to watch his television ads from Kentucky.

Moons.

If any one's a threat to popular/democratic election, let him learn from north africa/arab world and also from the economies of despotic sub-saharan african countries. United Nations. . .please remember "WESTERN SAHARA" (may be because they have no oil)