This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Shtal on 27 October 2011 - 04:10
Interesting to point out about moon and earth are tidally locked as a pair - and only moon coincidentally circling a civilization in our solar system; moon tries to pull the earth like a large magnet, but it could not because earth has gravitational pull and basically can hold onto everything but moving waters. Continuing with this topic – right now evidence being observed moon goes around the earth and gradually getting farther away, we slowly loosing the moon, it’s leaving us couple inches a year.
No big deal, nothing to worry about, plus nothing you could do about it anyway. But the moon is getting farther from the earth – every day. So that means it used to be closer. If you bring a moon closer you will start to create a problem – because the moon causes the tides.
If the moon was closer - then the tides will be higher. There is a law called “The Inverse Square Law” If you brought the moon 1/3 distance, you take 1/3 flip it over and square it – it’s nine times gravitational pull. If you know the math on this, you find out – the moon and the earth will be almost together 1.4 billions years ago. (Like Crashing on each other) Is their any logical explanation and evidence you could show how Earth and Moon worked together millions and billions of years ago since you believe evolution theory. I know push and pull gravitational between Earth and Moon, but the evidence now shows that it getting farther away, we slowly loosing the moon, it’s leaving us couple inches a year. Could you show solid evidence of millions/billions of years?
Thank you!
No big deal, nothing to worry about, plus nothing you could do about it anyway. But the moon is getting farther from the earth – every day. So that means it used to be closer. If you bring a moon closer you will start to create a problem – because the moon causes the tides.
If the moon was closer - then the tides will be higher. There is a law called “The Inverse Square Law” If you brought the moon 1/3 distance, you take 1/3 flip it over and square it – it’s nine times gravitational pull. If you know the math on this, you find out – the moon and the earth will be almost together 1.4 billions years ago. (Like Crashing on each other) Is their any logical explanation and evidence you could show how Earth and Moon worked together millions and billions of years ago since you believe evolution theory. I know push and pull gravitational between Earth and Moon, but the evidence now shows that it getting farther away, we slowly loosing the moon, it’s leaving us couple inches a year. Could you show solid evidence of millions/billions of years?
Thank you!
by Chaz Reinhold on 27 October 2011 - 04:10
Shtal, you make me want to be a badder man.
by Shtal on 27 October 2011 - 05:10
Chaz,
Did I say something wrong about evolution flaw? Since the planet Jupiter is cooling off rapidly, constantly loosing heat, it cannot be billions of years old – it would have been cold by now. Jupiter moon ganymede has strong magnetic field – indicating liquid core – meaning is not billions of years old.
Did I say something wrong about evolution flaw? Since the planet Jupiter is cooling off rapidly, constantly loosing heat, it cannot be billions of years old – it would have been cold by now. Jupiter moon ganymede has strong magnetic field – indicating liquid core – meaning is not billions of years old.
by Chaz Reinhold on 27 October 2011 - 05:10
In plain English, you make me want to rip someone's (yirs) head off and shit down their neck. But I'm a Christian, so I won't. I'll just drink a drink and fahgitaboutit!
by Chaz Reinhold on 27 October 2011 - 05:10
Evolution? Go to a zoo. Chimps are still scratching their asses while we film the on our iPhones.
by Shtal on 27 October 2011 - 05:10
LOL, you must be dangerous christian, hopefully I won't meet you in second life after death.
by Two Moons on 28 October 2011 - 17:10
Shtal,
Everything is in motion, everything.
Nothing stands still, not a rock, not the sea, not the heavens, and certainly not the Earth and Moon.
This is life itself, this motion, the universe we know and those we do not.
How do you measure infinity, these are questions I have no interest in, the beginning or end is irrelevant.
If you do not except Carbon dating as a way of measuring the passing of time, then what do you use in it's place?
How do you come up with the moment of creation?
Much of science is theory, they say so right on the box, some has been proven some not.
Theory is a work in progress, not belief because one say's it is so.
Just ask Einstein, a few of his theories are now in question.
Proof of evolution is easy, you can see it all around you, and not by looking out into space but by watching it happen in places where it happens fast.
Evolution of the universe is much slower and harder to see, nothing in the universe is perfect, certainly not the orbit of the Moon or anything else.
Nothing stays the same, it is moving and changing for all time, including our knowledge.
Mathematics has it's limitations, faith too has it's limitations.
I may well believe a man named Jesus once lived and walked the Earth, but what proof do you have that he did, or that he was the half human, half God your religion claims.
Immaculate conception, prove that one.
Prove the resurrection.
If either of us had the answer we would not have a debate, all things would be known and nothing disputed, what a boring lifeless existence that would be.
This is the way it is supposed to be, every moment different from the last.
Your religion claims to know the future, this is not possible in my opinion, you can only know the past, the future is fluid, in motion as well.
What's more important, the most important perhaps to you, is that your religion is not the only religion that men believe in.
To say yours is the only one, or the only correct belief is nonsense.
Prove it,
Moons.
Everything is in motion, everything.
Nothing stands still, not a rock, not the sea, not the heavens, and certainly not the Earth and Moon.
This is life itself, this motion, the universe we know and those we do not.
How do you measure infinity, these are questions I have no interest in, the beginning or end is irrelevant.
If you do not except Carbon dating as a way of measuring the passing of time, then what do you use in it's place?
How do you come up with the moment of creation?
Much of science is theory, they say so right on the box, some has been proven some not.
Theory is a work in progress, not belief because one say's it is so.
Just ask Einstein, a few of his theories are now in question.
Proof of evolution is easy, you can see it all around you, and not by looking out into space but by watching it happen in places where it happens fast.
Evolution of the universe is much slower and harder to see, nothing in the universe is perfect, certainly not the orbit of the Moon or anything else.
Nothing stays the same, it is moving and changing for all time, including our knowledge.
Mathematics has it's limitations, faith too has it's limitations.
I may well believe a man named Jesus once lived and walked the Earth, but what proof do you have that he did, or that he was the half human, half God your religion claims.
Immaculate conception, prove that one.
Prove the resurrection.
If either of us had the answer we would not have a debate, all things would be known and nothing disputed, what a boring lifeless existence that would be.
This is the way it is supposed to be, every moment different from the last.
Your religion claims to know the future, this is not possible in my opinion, you can only know the past, the future is fluid, in motion as well.
What's more important, the most important perhaps to you, is that your religion is not the only religion that men believe in.
To say yours is the only one, or the only correct belief is nonsense.
Prove it,
Moons.
by Red Sable on 28 October 2011 - 19:10
To me there is tons of proof, and I can't see why others don't see it, however, I guess that is the way it is supposed to be.
How do you explain our time calendar? BC (before Christ) or AC (after Christ). Where did the holidays Christmas and Easter come from? Did someone make them up?
Many believe in a God, but don't (or don't want to) believe in a Devil, yet the evil in this world is blatantly obvious.
Anyhoo we can argue till we are blue in the face, it won't change a thing until God opens eyes, but one thing for sure is, time will tell, or death, whichever comes first.
It's nice that you can discuss this Moons and stay polite. Cheers!
How do you explain our time calendar? BC (before Christ) or AC (after Christ). Where did the holidays Christmas and Easter come from? Did someone make them up?
Many believe in a God, but don't (or don't want to) believe in a Devil, yet the evil in this world is blatantly obvious.
Anyhoo we can argue till we are blue in the face, it won't change a thing until God opens eyes, but one thing for sure is, time will tell, or death, whichever comes first.
It's nice that you can discuss this Moons and stay polite. Cheers!
by 4pack on 28 October 2011 - 21:10
BC, AC, Christmas and Easter are proof of Christ? ROTFLMFAO 
by Red Sable on 28 October 2011 - 21:10
Instead of being snarky, why not give an intelligent reason why our calendar years are based on Christ's life and death if he didn't exist? and why we celebrate his birth and crucifixion? and have for centuries?
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top