Is she or isn't she? Bi -color> - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Damright on 26 September 2011 - 21:09

Ok experts, is she or isn't she?


by Ibrahim on 26 September 2011 - 21:09

That is a difficult one, I would say not but I'll be watching what the knowlegable members will vote !!!

Ibrahim

Red Sable

by Red Sable on 26 September 2011 - 21:09

I say yes. 

Love the top right pose, is that hard to teach?

yellowrose of Texas

by yellowrose of Texas on 26 September 2011 - 21:09



  Can you enlarge the picture showing her paws?  and side of face better.?

   I would say   YES  she is BI

    I would love to see her    BACK END?

   The pup pic  makes no difference..Many a pup is born with little marking and then by 8 months old here comes all the red on sides of face ,
 

    IF the adult picture were larger and there is not red on face except the dots over eyses

    YOUR dog is a  BI COLOR

  However if she has patches of red or tan on both sides of face bigger than palm size she is  black and tan


    YR


 




by Ibrahim on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

Can you also please tell us whether she has tan/gray on her under (belly) ?
Ibrahim

by delacruz germanshepherds on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

From the pictures here I would say she is Bi

by Damright on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

Well I am in a motel right now and not at home with her. I called the boss and she says that Stormys underside is black except for her armpit areas. I don't really know how to blow up any of the pictures that I have. I will try to get better pics when I get home, and upload them.  She will be a year old Oct. 11th, so I would think she is old enough to figure it out.

isachev

by isachev on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

I think it's really close. But I say no. No pencil markings on front paws and I don't see black tar heels. I maybe wrong, need a few better pics to be certain.    Pete

isachev

by isachev on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

One more thing, would like to see her hind (as YR said) and her upper chest/neck area.  Pete

jc.carroll

by jc.carroll on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

I've been wanting to say this for years, so I guess I finally will:

Pencil markings can be very subtle to practically non-existant. Former rottweiler-fanatic turned GSD entusiast here. Seen many a rott that doesn't have noticable pencil-markings, and barely any tarheels. I have also seen rotts with rather lighter-than-black underfur, and a very subtle reddish tint behind the ears. Obviously, this isn't desirable.

I use the vent to tell bicolour from black: tan vent means a bicolour; black vent means a black dog.

I've never seen a rott with anything other than a black belly, however. The dogs I would classify as melanistic blanket/saddleback GSDs have all had either a greyish belly, or tan that marches from their stockings and covers their belly.



Genetic bicolours have a belly like this (not my dog; image found via Google). Note, you can't see pencil markings on the toes






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top