
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Damright on 26 September 2011 - 21:09
Ok experts, is she or isn't she?
by Ibrahim on 26 September 2011 - 21:09
Ibrahim

by Red Sable on 26 September 2011 - 21:09
Love the top right pose, is that hard to teach?

by yellowrose of Texas on 26 September 2011 - 21:09
Can you enlarge the picture showing her paws? and side of face better.?
I would say YES she is BI
I would love to see her BACK END?
The pup pic makes no difference..Many a pup is born with little marking and then by 8 months old here comes all the red on sides of face ,
IF the adult picture were larger and there is not red on face except the dots over eyses
YOUR dog is a BI COLOR
However if she has patches of red or tan on both sides of face bigger than palm size she is black and tan
YR
by Ibrahim on 26 September 2011 - 22:09
Ibrahim
by delacruz germanshepherds on 26 September 2011 - 22:09
by Damright on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

by isachev on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

by isachev on 26 September 2011 - 22:09

by jc.carroll on 26 September 2011 - 22:09
Pencil markings can be very subtle to practically non-existant. Former rottweiler-fanatic turned GSD entusiast here. Seen many a rott that doesn't have noticable pencil-markings, and barely any tarheels. I have also seen rotts with rather lighter-than-black underfur, and a very subtle reddish tint behind the ears. Obviously, this isn't desirable.
I use the vent to tell bicolour from black: tan vent means a bicolour; black vent means a black dog.
I've never seen a rott with anything other than a black belly, however. The dogs I would classify as melanistic blanket/saddleback GSDs have all had either a greyish belly, or tan that marches from their stockings and covers their belly.
Genetic bicolours have a belly like this (not my dog; image found via Google). Note, you can't see pencil markings on the toes


Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top