
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by RDH on 16 September 2011 - 21:09
He says yes because if you make a certain amount of money for the year it is concerned a reported income and if found out that one is not you will be owing the IRS.
True or False?

by GSDNewbie on 16 September 2011 - 21:09
by SitasMom on 16 September 2011 - 21:09
income is income
but there's usually so many more expenses then income so its really easy expanse out every bit of the income and make it a wash.
cost of stock - and depreciation, stud fees, registration fees, food & treats, all vet care, club fees, trial and show entries, mileage when ever a dog is in the car... all fair exemptions
part of the house or yard used for breeding and housing.....

by Donnerstorm on 17 September 2011 - 01:09
by RDH on 17 September 2011 - 20:09
Well, the only way they are caught is if they are reported (which that person who reports is rewarded by the IRS) or you get sued(or if you sell to military/police you leave a trail). So why take the chance of doing so with out being licenses? I'm pretty sure if people or clients are looking for a quality dog for work or whatever, they would ask the breeder if they are licenses? If they say no, then there is a chance that the client would report. So why the risk? I do see where you all are coming from with the money for the litter pays for all your expenses. My thing is yes it does but if caught your penalty fees will probably be more than your expenses over the years, right?
by hexe on 17 September 2011 - 21:09
(B) You can be sued by anyone you sell a dog to, not just the military or police.
(C) The whole 'licensed versus unlicensed' thing is most likely a local matter--the only kennel licenses the Federal Gov't issues are for what are considered to be 'commercial' kennels, AKA 'puppy mills' in some cases (not all). The USDA kennel licenses are for wholesalers of dogs, breeders who sell dogs to other wholesalers, those who sell dogs to research facilities, and any breeder with more than US$500.00 gross annual sales (note that this is GROSS, not NET, so your cost offsets don't count toward this). There is an exemption for "Hobby breeders" who have less then US$500.00 gross annual sales, AND who own no more than 3 breeding females AND who sell the offspring into pet channels only (must meet all 3 criteria). Those who sell breeding stock to other breeders may be required to be licensed as well.
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/downloads/aw/awlicreg.pdf
(D) Whether you are Federally licensed, locally licensed, or not licensed at all isn't what determines whether or not you have to pay taxes on monies generated by the sale of dogs...IRS tax laws determine that, and as complicated as THAT is, I wouldn't trust info or advice on the subject from anyone other than a CPA.
by RDH on 18 September 2011 - 23:09
This was a general conversation. I didn't think breeders had to pay anything because I didn't look at it in a business aspect. One being they do it at home and no helpers to pay out to (nothing to get caught up on). Plus, other minor factors. I will review the link you provided, thanks just wanted to get a general answer and why.
For the military and police that comment from the doc was it leaves a trail where the person gets tracked down vs a regular ol joe off the streets that make a purchase.
by lonewulf on 19 September 2011 - 17:09
Dr. Ravi Iyer, MD
Vienna, VA

by Niesia on 19 September 2011 - 18:09
IRS considers breeding a hobby - therefore you have to report income BUT you cannot deduct the expenses... Not really fair as the breeding costs can be pretty big...
by RDH on 20 September 2011 - 02:09
I'm not a doc...well as of yet. I applied to dental school so I'm waiting for the verdict.
Thanks guys for the insite. Just wanted to know.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top