
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Prager on 04 January 2011 - 21:01

by Pirates Lair on 04 January 2011 - 21:01
Handler error for one, also the story never mentioned whether the Spitz was on a leash. Trouble waiting to happen.
Kim

by Don Corleone on 04 January 2011 - 22:01

by clc29 on 04 January 2011 - 23:01
The officer / handler of the dog should be removed from the K9 team. This incident shows that the handler is irresponsible. The dog should not be held accountable. Just my opinion.
Wonder what Slamdunk would say?
C

by Slamdunc on 04 January 2011 - 23:01
I have two GSD's, both raised from pups. Both trained one in SchH and one a K9. If my personal dog, not my K9 got loose and attacked another dog it's one thing.....However, if my K9 gets loose and attacks another dog it is a huge thing and National news. I could lose my job, be put out of the unit, loose the dog, sued civilly. Having and working a K-9 is huge responsibility and mishaps like this should never happen.
I can't think of a valid reason for someone other than the handler to be out walking this dog, certainly someone that can not control the dog. But, I'll wait for more details to come out before passing any further judgement.
Jim

by JRANSOM on 04 January 2011 - 23:01
Slamdunc -

by leffew4116 on 04 January 2011 - 23:01
But, strange question to people own k9 dogs. I thought that they were sometimes given away after they were retired? Doesn't that mean that average people own ex-k9 dogs? I could definitely be wrong, I just remember someone trying to give me one once.
Also, what does dog aggression have to do with be a police k9? Why would a one even have any dog aggression, aren't they commonly worked around other dogs? But since it obviously does, will that matter to it's job? The person said the dog shouldn't work anymore, but that sounds silly to me. I don't have anything to do with police dogs, so I really have no clue. I'm just being curious. :)

by JRANSOM on 05 January 2011 - 00:01
Makes sense what you say. If a K-9 is dog aggressive but only the handler can control him and prevent anything from happening and call him off then only that handler should handle him. Just say there was a foot chase going on and the dog was sent in. The handler is right behind him and if there was another dog encountered the dog would be given a command and redirected. (hopefully he'd listen, the're still dogs no matter what extent of training). I don't think anyone but the handler should have been walking this dog w/o the training the handler has. That's why he's the handler. And, if he didn't specifically tell his family not to walk the dog w/o him then he too is at fault. If he did and they didn't listen he shouldn't be held accountable although I"m sure he still will be but because of their negligence.

by MaggieMae on 05 January 2011 - 01:01

by Slamdunc on 05 January 2011 - 01:01
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top