
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Bhaugh on 26 December 2010 - 06:12
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHLnjiISsOo&feature=related

by Ruger1 on 26 December 2010 - 06:12
IMO, the dog was giving warning signs that he was uncomfortable with the reporter petting him, I think that the handler should have been more alert to the body language of his dog, I think that the reporter was ignorant like many people about appropriate behavior around dogs.....Handler was responsible 100%.......JMO.....I am not sure about the stability of the dog for work, I will let someone more knowledgeable tackle that question.............
Deanna...: )
by eichenluft on 26 December 2010 - 08:12
molly
by duke1965 on 26 December 2010 - 09:12
you could see this coming from second one

by Beardog on 26 December 2010 - 11:12

by Jyl on 26 December 2010 - 12:12
The officer should have had a little "meeting" with the reporter before meeting the dog and be told the "do's and dont's". I will say that the reporter had very poor dogs skills.
A momentary laps in judgement. Doesnt make him a bad officer, afterall they are human just like the rest of us.
by frankm205 on 26 December 2010 - 13:12

by Red Sable on 26 December 2010 - 14:12
Crazy. The police officer should have known better. The reporter kept pushing it, getting closer and closer, and than held him with both hands? WT??
It was not the dogs fault at all. This is not a pet. Both men were just plain foolish.

by Kalibeck on 26 December 2010 - 14:12

by Don Corleone on 26 December 2010 - 14:12
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top