
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by PowerHaus on 15 September 2010 - 16:09


by Ace952 on 15 September 2010 - 16:09
What are they trying to hide is the question.

by PowerHaus on 15 September 2010 - 16:09
Vickie
www.PowerHausKennels.com
by bazza on 15 September 2010 - 17:09

by Two Moons on 15 September 2010 - 17:09
by crhuerta on 15 September 2010 - 17:09

I am also thinking that perhaps the picture is just "distorted" by the handlers hand under the dogs chin & neck area.....??
You can see that the handler's arm is extended somewhat (look at shoulder area).....so it is more probable that the picture is authentic........HORRIBLE picture to say the least....does not do that dog any justice.
Robin
by Lennard on 15 September 2010 - 21:09
There is a fuzzy area to the left of the dogs head and the chin is an odd shape, also the Ruff to the right of the head appears also to not belong to the body

by PowerHaus on 15 September 2010 - 22:09
Vickie
www.PowerHausKennels.com
by shepherdace on 16 September 2010 - 02:09
I used to blame photoshop until the BSZS 2010 where I observed that a large number of the actual dogs are so beautifully "coloured" that for a moment I honestly believed pigmentation had improved by leaps and and bounds.I have always believed pigment can be improved in two ways.
1)You breed for it.
2)You feed for it
I was proven wrong in Nurnberg.The third way is the easiest!!!!!!!!!

by windwalker18 on 16 September 2010 - 07:09
The WORSE add pic is still the portly shirtless guy with the purple thong and hairy legs... *shudder*
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top