Bad photoshop or what??? - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

PowerHaus

by PowerHaus on 15 September 2010 - 16:09

Is this a bad photoshop job or what????


Ace952

by Ace952 on 15 September 2010 - 16:09

lol!!!!!!

What are they trying to hide is the question.

PowerHaus

by PowerHaus on 15 September 2010 - 16:09

To me, the body and the head aren't the same dog!

Vickie
www.PowerHausKennels.com

by bazza on 15 September 2010 - 17:09

Can't quite decide if it actually is photoshopped or not. The head does appear strange. But I think the handler has such a handful of the dogs skin trying to get the dog to face forward he has distorted the look.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 15 September 2010 - 17:09

What an great dog thread, a shame I can't see the picture. I am able to see Rugers photobucket picture of her dogs natural stack.. But it's not using this system so I guess that explains that.

by crhuerta on 15 September 2010 - 17:09

Hi Bazza! nice to see a post from you!
I am also thinking that perhaps the picture is just "distorted" by the handlers hand under the dogs chin & neck area.....??
You can see that the handler's arm is extended somewhat (look at shoulder area).....so it is more probable that the picture is authentic........HORRIBLE picture to say the least....does not do that dog any justice.
Robin

by Lennard on 15 September 2010 - 21:09

If you enlarge photo by 400% it looks as if the dogs head has been taken from a photo of a dog facing you with the body to the rear and slightly to the left.
There is a fuzzy area to the left of the dogs head and the chin is an odd shape, also the Ruff to the right  of the head appears also to not belong to the body

PowerHaus

by PowerHaus on 15 September 2010 - 22:09

Lennard, that is what I thought too!

Vickie
www.PowerHausKennels.com

by shepherdace on 16 September 2010 - 02:09

I used to blame photoshop until the BSZS 2010 where I observed that a large number of the actual dogs are so beautifully "coloured" that for a moment I honestly believed pigmentation had improved by leaps and and bounds.I have always believed pigment can be improved in two ways.
    1)You breed for it.
    2)You feed for it
I was proven wrong in Nurnberg.The third way is the easiest!!!!!!!!!


windwalker18

by windwalker18 on 16 September 2010 - 07:09

The guy looks about to strangle the dog... suspect he wasn't co-operating with being stacked...

The WORSE add pic is still the portly shirtless guy with the purple thong and hairy legs...  *shudder*





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top