
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Eric Eisenberg on 28 August 2010 - 10:08
all interested contact:
Eric S. Eisenberg at eseisenberg@msn.com

by dogladyj on 29 August 2010 - 13:08
JoAnn Letcher

by MAINLYMAX on 29 August 2010 - 15:08
USA=WUSV=ball&chain..........My question is..... will others follow in your
foot steps......The declaration of independence was proceeded by the Boston Tea party.
WUSV is foolish...... that's is a given, ..but they still hold all the keys and they know it.
US has more GSD's than any other country in the world and should have some say.
But I think you will need something to galvanize the people to take a stand, and burn their
membership cards. It is too bad this has to happen. If the USA team boycotts than you have
a Tea party!!!

by Rik on 29 August 2010 - 18:08
I came away with the impression that the goal will be providing an opportunity to train dogs on a high level and certainly not a WDA vs. UScA agenda.
Best,
Rick Atchley

by yellowrose of Texas on 30 August 2010 - 06:08
You will all do great..
YR

by Myracle on 30 August 2010 - 07:08

by MAINLYMAX on 30 August 2010 - 19:08
Not my agenda, it is USA & WUSV........who say... if you stray we will blackball you from our events.
Eric and alot of other people think that they have no right to do that. So they choose to do WDA, and live
without WUSV. It is not one vs the other,.. but one telling you, you can not train with WDA. It is political and
has nothing to do with the improvement of the breed or anything that lofty. Just greed on the part of
WUSV.
by ceddyg on 30 August 2010 - 21:08
Mainlymax,
I'm a little confused about the living without the WUSV part. Eric is competing at the WUSV this yr with his dog for WDA. Can you please clarify what you meant by that?
ceddy

by MAINLYMAX on 31 August 2010 - 15:08
Eric may be testing the sanction against WDA, from WUSV. It will be interesting
because WUSV has come out against any outside Organizations competing in their events.
They have also said Members of WUSV can not hold two memberships, and specifically mentioned
WDA.
by wallacepayne on 31 August 2010 - 17:08
Your information is incorrect(: 1.) The WUSV has said one country one vote but the five countries that have two votes are grandfathered in, unless one drops out those countries will continue to have two votes. (. 2.) They have no such sanction against WDA they still send judges to judge WDA trials/ events, as a matter of fact the V.P. of the SV (who just judge protection at the WDA Nationals this past May) and the Director of Judges of the SV will be judging the WDA Nationals next year. ( 3.) Eric is testing nothing because there is nothing to test.
I'm sure you meant well but you information is very incorrect, check your sources next time. Becareful, when information is put out without any bases to back it up, it only help fuel fires that need not be lit.
Wallace Payne
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top