
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by k9sar06 on 14 May 2009 - 14:05
What is the difference in a Bi-Color & a Bi-Black??
If you have pictures it would be great.
by kioanes on 14 May 2009 - 14:05

by vomlandholz on 14 May 2009 - 14:05

by ShelleyR on 14 May 2009 - 15:05
by eichenluft on 14 May 2009 - 15:05
Just because I happen to have a new litter of puppies who are starting to show their markings - here is a bicolor female who is going to have brighter markings, next to her brother who already has minimal facial markings which will most likely completely disappear as he continues to mature.


by Ibrahim on 14 May 2009 - 18:05
If you did not say they are bi color I would say they are black/tan, amazing!
I can ad one thing that indicates a puppy will turn out black/tan which is the brown color on back of ears, what do you say?
by eichenluft on 14 May 2009 - 19:05
molly

by Silbersee on 14 May 2009 - 19:05
I know that the gene for bi-colors is different than the one for black and tan/brown/red. But does this gene need to be present in both breeding partners, or is one enough? Is this gene paired with the black gene or not, since the black gene is actually a masking gene?
I have an almost 20 week old female at home who is very dark. But she does not have toe heels, so I suspect that she is not a bi. Her father certainly does not carry this gene, but her mother does.
by eichenluft on 14 May 2009 - 20:05
I have a bicolor female with 'bright' markings (more tan than most, but still no tan on belly/behind ears, and black toemarks/tarheels) she does not carry black recessive. So the answer to that question is no, bicolors are not necessarily connected to black recessive. My female produces bicolors, sables and black/tans depending on who she is bred to - but no blacks (yes I have bred her twice to black males).
I have heard the different theories that bicolor is it's own color gene - I am not convinced (yet). I have always thought that bicolor was a melanistic "tag" attached to the black/tan color gene. But I am still not sure about that. I guess if my two puppies pictured above turn out to be one black/tan and one bicolor, then the bicolor gene "tag" theory is correct and not the bicolor gene being separate. The puppies' mother is sable (with bicolor/blacktan recessive) and the sire is black.
molly

by Red Sable on 14 May 2009 - 20:05
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top