
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Ryanhaus on 09 May 2009 - 22:05
I was wondering why you would pay between $100.00 -- $500.00 to get this for your answer.........
Borderline: there is no clear cut consensus between the radiologists to place the hip into a given category of normal or dysplastic. There is usually more incongruency present than what occurs in the minor amount found in a fair but there are no arthritic changes present that definitively diagnose the hip joint being dysplastic. There also may be a bony projection present on any of the areas of the hip anatomy illustrated above that can not accurately be assessed as being an abnormal arthritic change or as a normal anatomic variant for that individual dog. To increase the accuracy of a correct diagnosis, it is recommended to repeat the radiographs at a later date (usually 6 months). This allows the radiologist to compare the initial film with the most recent film over a given time period and assess for progressive arthritic changes that would be expected if the dog was truly dysplastic. Most dogs with this grade (over 50%) show no change in hip conformation over time and receive a normal hip rating; usually a fair hip phenotype.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$CHA>>>CHING.............
Read the bottom line... Does that suck you in like a good cigar or what, do it again, (pay for an x-ray AGAIN, we almost
guarantee you'll get a passing grade
Borderline: there is no clear cut consensus between the radiologists to place the hip into a given category of normal or dysplastic. There is usually more incongruency present than what occurs in the minor amount found in a fair but there are no arthritic changes present that definitively diagnose the hip joint being dysplastic. There also may be a bony projection present on any of the areas of the hip anatomy illustrated above that can not accurately be assessed as being an abnormal arthritic change or as a normal anatomic variant for that individual dog. To increase the accuracy of a correct diagnosis, it is recommended to repeat the radiographs at a later date (usually 6 months). This allows the radiologist to compare the initial film with the most recent film over a given time period and assess for progressive arthritic changes that would be expected if the dog was truly dysplastic. Most dogs with this grade (over 50%) show no change in hip conformation over time and receive a normal hip rating; usually a fair hip phenotype.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$CHA>>>CHING.............

Read the bottom line... Does that suck you in like a good cigar or what, do it again, (pay for an x-ray AGAIN, we almost
guarantee you'll get a passing grade

by B.Andersen on 10 May 2009 - 04:05
Use the SV
by Teri on 10 May 2009 - 12:05
What is the benefit of using the SV over OFA. Not being a smart butt, I just don't know.
Teri
Teri
by B.Andersen on 10 May 2009 - 19:05
Well for one thing the person that grades hips for the SV is a hip specialist as they have a elbow specialist. All hips graded through the SV are done by the hip guy and all dogs elbows are done by the elbow guy. The SV uses a system called the Norberg angle not just someones opinion . OFA opinions are all over the place. I will never use them again.
by TessJ10 on 11 May 2009 - 15:05
Oh, c'mon. They're simply telling you that they see a bony projection and have no way of knowing if it's a progressive arthritic change or perhaps just the way that dog is built. So they were honest and told you that. If you x-ray again in 6 months, if it's arthritic you'll probably be able to see degenerative changes, and if it's exactly the same, then it's probably just the way that dog is.
Why are you all bent out of shape because they were honest with you? Do you want them to lie? Do you want them to say your dog is dysplastic and NOT give him the benefit of the doubt?
Why are you all bent out of shape because they were honest with you? Do you want them to lie? Do you want them to say your dog is dysplastic and NOT give him the benefit of the doubt?

by gagsd4 on 11 May 2009 - 15:05
Redo them.
A friend's bitch went borderline (ZW of 79). 12 months later they went moderate.
--Mary
A friend's bitch went borderline (ZW of 79). 12 months later they went moderate.
--Mary
by TessJ10 on 11 May 2009 - 15:05
Borderline? I thought ZW 100 was "average"?

by Ryanhaus on 11 May 2009 - 15:05
Thanks B.Anderson,
You might have told me already to use the SV, this time I'll take your advice, you seem to know what you're taking about
in many of your posts, you can back up your opinions, I like that,
Thanks again,
Paula
You might have told me already to use the SV, this time I'll take your advice, you seem to know what you're taking about
in many of your posts, you can back up your opinions, I like that,
Thanks again,
Paula
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top