
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Rexy on 28 January 2009 - 14:01
The never ending debate that show line's prancing around the show ring doesn't demonstrate the breeds working ability being a component of the GSD's that is overlooked in shows, why don't they implement a working test of some description for a dog to qualify into the show???. If it fails the working test regardless of it's confirmation and good looks, it goes home disqualified with no entry pass into the show.
A champion dog must exhibit a balance of what the breed is about, good confirmation and the ability to work??? A winner in confirmation that is too scared to jump up on the podium is no better than a champion at work that doesn't conform. Should there be a proper balance???

by London on 28 January 2009 - 14:01

by Rexy on 28 January 2009 - 14:01
London, I am not sure as to what level of work, but a trial of some description. I was hoping that someone experienced in working trials could suggest the appropriate level required???

by sueincc on 28 January 2009 - 14:01
Rexy: Are you talking about something above and beyond what the SV requires?
by ceddyg on 28 January 2009 - 15:01
by lonewulf on 28 January 2009 - 15:01
OH NO!
Here we go again!!!
by eichenluft on 28 January 2009 - 15:01
sounds to me like the OP is talking about American Show GSDs, not SV.
if OP is talkign about SV GSDs - then "supposedly" they do have a work prequisite for entering the shows - a Schutzhund title.
molly

by Rexy on 28 January 2009 - 15:01
In Australia, there is no working requirement whatsoever. I wasn't aware that a working requirement was in place to enter shows elsewhere which is good to hear. In that case there shouldn't be too many comments in regard to a show line's lack of working ability at the major international events then??? I agree "one name one breed" is what I am getting at!!!.
by Bob McKown on 28 January 2009 - 15:01
Well as long as they keep lowering the standard in the working trials you probably will see more showline dogs working at trials...

by Davren on 28 January 2009 - 16:01
I think it is interesting that this type of debate is not limited to GSD's or not limited to just dogs. While I have very limited experience in the show/working arena with my beloved German Shepherd, I d have quite a few years under my belt in the showing of American Quarter Horses.
It is no different with the horses. There is a tremendous difference between the "Halter" classes and the "working" classes; for example: the western pleasure working cow horse, reining, barrels, calf-roping, etc. There has always been the "ribbing" between the halter people and the working horse people-the old "my horse is better than yours" and "my horse fits the original standard for the breed".
I think the it was sad what some of the quarter horse people did in the name of competition and how cruel they could be with their horses to win a class, to sell a horse, to earn a title. It was horrific at times.
Eventually, the AQHA registry began to realize that there was a big problem and started promoting the AQH has the versatile horse; in other words, there were different types for different people and their particular passion. I am not sure the problem was solved but there was some improvement.
I think I have noticed a greater change since the economy has changed. No horse sells for the crazy prices they once brought. At a recent registered sale, the consignment fee was $75. There were weanlings with known bloodlines and good conformation that brought less then $75. It was sad, but in some ways it was a wake up call to all the greed that once drove the breeders to mass produce based on papers and titles.
Just my thoughts....
We no longer actively breed and/or show horses; we simply enjoy them and trail ride whenever possible. It is much more fun. Now maybe I will have time to show our dogs!!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top