From that to this! - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

aristianM

by aristianM on 27 September 2008 - 06:09

She was 8 months old in the 1st pic. Now is 17 months old and maturing very nicely. People who havent seen her since she was 8 months old, think she is a different dog. What do you think?


Shepherd Woman

by Shepherd Woman on 27 September 2008 - 11:09

Looks like the same dog to me.  Colors change, but you can tell she's still easty westy, and her stack still looks the same.  Long legs and all....


aristianM

by aristianM on 27 September 2008 - 14:09

I think she has changed a lot. Structure has improved, croup has improved, topline is better, rae angulation is better. Not as leggy as she used to be and is well angulated now. If anyone disagrees with me, please tell me why? Thanks :)


funky munky

by funky munky on 28 September 2008 - 12:09

 

 

AND THEN YOU REALLY WAKE UP. LIZ


missbeeb

by missbeeb on 28 September 2008 - 12:09

LOL!!!


by Gefaehrlich on 28 September 2008 - 13:09

She has changed a lot.  She looks to have nice pigment and a pretty headpiece (from what I can see from the side angle). I think her topline was better in the first pic.  I think her problem is that she needs taller withers... this throws off the topline, and also the front & particularly the rear angulation.  Is she your show prospect?  She's not as leggy as before, but because she doesn't have enough withers it makes her front legs look too short.


aristianM

by aristianM on 28 September 2008 - 13:09

Misbeeb and Funky Munky get a goddamn life! Thanks you ever soo much Gefaehrlich! I really really appreciate your input.Oh her neck looks a little weird because she had an infection and the vet shaved her neck. Its been a month now and the hair is growing back slowly.I dont care with you think or say misbeeb and funky munky i think she is beautiful, unless you have a proper critique your if you would like to make a proper contribution, please dont waste my time!


funky munky

by funky munky on 28 September 2008 - 19:09

 

You have been given many proper critiques,but because you are dilusional you will not accept them.People with years of experience have given you good honest critiques,you cannot accept your dog is pet quality and nothing else.The only ones you are likely to listen to are the ones who agree with you,well don't hold your breathe there won't be many of them.She will never be a top show dog,but will probably make a very nice pet,or there are many other things you could participate in with her.PLEASE,do not breed her,or use her as your foundation bitch for your "working dog kennel" you intend starting in a few years,start with the best please. liz


VonIsengard

by VonIsengard on 29 September 2008 - 01:09

Her topline and rear angulations look identical to me. Her croup actually looks to have better angulation when she was younger, in my opinion.  She does not look as leggy now because her body has filled out.  She has good color, dry, nice pasterns and feet.  Gef- I think her topline issue resides more in the fact that her rear angulation is not correct moreso than her withers not being high enough, although she could use more length in the upper arm.

Of course she is beautiful to you because you love her. I would love to see a front head shot of her. Without seeing her move, her hip/elbow rating, and most importantly how she works I would not dare to deem her breedworthy or not.  I will say if you want to breed showline dogs, you can do better structurally in a foundation bitch. My honest evaluation.


by Teri on 29 September 2008 - 14:09

This may seem stupid but what does easty westy mean? 

Teri






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top