
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by HighDesertGSD on 25 September 2008 - 00:09
I want to ask those who feed raw chicken necks and back (etc) often.
Do you think that all the bone are digested? Is it true that only a portion of the bone in necks and backs is digested? Do you see a lot of bones in the stool?
As much as I think dogs digestive juices are very acidic, I guess only a part of the bone is disgested.
What I am driving at really is calcium utility.
Thanks

by sueincc on 25 September 2008 - 00:09
I feed necks & backs quite frequently. The stool is very small, dry and crumbly. I have seen bone pieces but only very rarely, blue moon sort of thing.

by Bob-O on 25 September 2008 - 02:09
Very little of the bone is actually digested. The harder, ossified material remains somewhat intact, although vital nutrients are removed from it as it passes through a dog's digestive system. Stomach acid softens the hard bone and makes it rubbery.
I would not be surprised to see small bone fragments in the stool after the ingestion of bone-especially heavy knuckle bones, etc.. If dogs eat very much bone, their stools will often be light-coloured and "crumbly". The danger of feeding too much bone is that a rubbery, undigestable mass of bone can lodge itself in the lower intestine and not allow partially-digested food to pass through.
But within reason, raw "green" bone, especially raw chicken necks, is excellent nutrition for a dog.
Best Regards,
Bob-O
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top