This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Älvkarlen on 17 October 2009 - 18:10
Is it anyone that understand why SV choose to include Vegas among the ones that did the best TSB in Ulm? (At the same time as they "forgot", or perhaps consious excluded several, that did amomg the best TSB:s.)
I regard it, in itself, as a very good idea to give those dogs more attention, but I don't understand why the responsible within SV don't seem to understand that they now, when they do like this, so to speak makes this good idea to a simple joke?
Vegas is one of the most well built dogs that ever has existed, but he for sure does not belong to the ones below!
I regard it, in itself, as a very good idea to give those dogs more attention, but I don't understand why the responsible within SV don't seem to understand that they now, when they do like this, so to speak makes this good idea to a simple joke?
Vegas is one of the most well built dogs that ever has existed, but he for sure does not belong to the ones below!
1014 Aik von der Ziegelbornschneise
1082 Randor vom Grevenbroicher Land
1289 Iwan von der Karl-May Höhle
1002 Untox von der Freiheit Westerholt
1037 Yack vom Kammberg
1018 Zidane vom Kammberg
1033 Ober von Bad-Boll
1041 Ballack zur Worringer Rheinaue
1019 Ronny vom Haus Kasfeld
1042 Hutch von der kalten Hardt
1074 Roy von der Friedrichskluft
1135 Nexx Hartis Bohemia
1114 Greif vom Intscheder Wehr
1110 Bronco zum Jürgenshof
1188 Filou von Ducati
1191 Duke von der Berghofer-Heide
1156 Amor vom Dorneburger Bach
1012 Javir vom Talka Marda
1236 Hillson von Athaba
1275 Vegas du Haut Mansard
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top