This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Justitia on 08 September 2009 - 14:09
This year's winner's show delivered in Ulm was from the ambience, as well as from the organisation a wonderful event. It was seen sporty one single disaster.
In particular the protective service of the GHKR dogs.
Now everybody looks for the culprits.
Of the decisively culprits was acting judge Peter Arth,
he has admitted these irregular protective services and has like into the bargain a lot of misjudgements.
The whole world is outraged. He has supplied a huge damage to the association for German shepherds and has with certainty many valuable members to resign brought.
In this way one can also destroy an association.
It is not likely to him yet sometimes consciously what he has done.
Where from he should also know it, he has never had himself something for which it itself would have closed repaid a protective service with it make.
I hope only that the people responsible of the SV the consequences pull from it and name never again such a man as a judge for such an important event. If he had character, he would deliver his judge ID-card. Or how do you see this ?
In particular the protective service of the GHKR dogs.
Now everybody looks for the culprits.
Of the decisively culprits was acting judge Peter Arth,
he has admitted these irregular protective services and has like into the bargain a lot of misjudgements.
The whole world is outraged. He has supplied a huge damage to the association for German shepherds and has with certainty many valuable members to resign brought.
In this way one can also destroy an association.
It is not likely to him yet sometimes consciously what he has done.
Where from he should also know it, he has never had himself something for which it itself would have closed repaid a protective service with it make.
I hope only that the people responsible of the SV the consequences pull from it and name never again such a man as a judge for such an important event. If he had character, he would deliver his judge ID-card. Or how do you see this ?
by Uber Land on 09 September 2009 - 02:09
agreed. I for one would have told the handlers who had the poorly performing dogs to get the hell off the field. no second chances and no going easy on them.
by Liesje on 09 September 2009 - 02:09
Some of the owners should be ashamed of themselves for putting their dogs in that position. Clearly they do not have the right temperament. The most disturbing to me was that in these cases, the exhibitors did not even appear surprised by how the dogs reacted. Maybe a few looked pissed off b/c they blamed the helper or judge, but none looked really embarassed or at least sorry for their dog.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top